|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
1 members (1 invisible),
876
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,492
Posts562,042
Members14,585
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465 |
Those fired cases look like the rifle may have an "improved" chamber. The cases certainly have less body taper and a better defined shoulder than a case fired in my Krag.
Jerry Liles
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311 Likes: 12 |
Jerry,
No, the case is not "improved". It may look that way due to necking down to 25 cal but the body of the case is standard. Maybe the shoulder is on a different angle as it is pushed back a ways making for a longer neck. The necks did have to be shortened about 1/8".
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465 |
Well it's no G&H, or Niedner rifle but it is a rather nicely done Krag, certainly much better than the usual and the metal finish seems to be excellent. Fix the forend cap and replace the waffle recoil pad and whiteline spacer and it would be right handsome.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278 |
I agree with WJL. The tip and the pad are really the only unaccepable parts of this gun.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76 |
I wonder if the same person that did that Krag, also did this one Mannlicher Krag on gunbroker
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465 |
Another nice Krag. I could certainly live with either but would like to take features from each and combine to make one really nice rifle. Actually I guess I am doing that with the one Steve Durren is building for me.
Wouldn't it be nice in .35 Krag for a woods carbine.
Jerry Liles
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 678 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 678 Likes: 15 |
That second one looks fat through the midsection. Probably because he felt the need to cover the side plate with wood. Not being a fan of full stocks except when they're on Mannlicher-Schoenauers, my first thought was cut the fore arm and give it a dainty schnaubel but the barrel band is positioned wrong for that and by the time the checkering were removed and re-done things would be getting too skinny. Sorry, just the impure thoughts that race through my head when I look at gun porn! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1 |
On #2, does the extra wood on the port side add any strength or stability to the stock?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 678 Likes: 15
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 678 Likes: 15 |
Sure, but strictly speaking it isn't necessary IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
