September
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Who's Online Now
2 members (Stanton Hillis, 1 invisible), 280 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,900
Posts550,593
Members14,458
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 9 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ed good #372791 07/16/14 08:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,804
Likes: 101
ed good Offline OP
Sidelock
*
OP Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,804
Likes: 101


keep it simple and keep it safe...
keith #372793 07/16/14 08:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Ed is a greedy, lying, out for himself and ONLY himself, SOB.He care not one whit about others and their gun rights he is concerned with one thing lining his pockets from unknowing buyers !

He should not be in the gun business,he is not a gun person he is just a sick-one look at his demented posts looking for attention ( and pushing his wares on the "lets talk double guns" thread),he needs serious help not attention.The very best thing we can do rid this board of him is to ignore all his posts and he will disappear


Hillary For Prison 2018
ed good #372817 07/16/14 11:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,804
Likes: 101
ed good Offline OP
Sidelock
*
OP Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,804
Likes: 101
boring...


keep it simple and keep it safe...
cpa #372820 07/16/14 12:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 33
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 33
Originally Posted By: cpa
Agree that the militarization of police forces is disturbing; however,I would suggest reading Factcheck regarding the quote about the Civilian National Security Force.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/11/obamas-national-security-force/


here is an excerpt of what he said according to factcheck: We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set.

We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
Fact Check didn't refute his words, they only tried to obfuscate his intent by connecting them to his mention of the peace corps/AmeriCorps type organizations and imply that he was talking about expanding them.

Their taking Obamas references to the Peace Corps and AmeriCorps and other such agencies and saying that's what he means is disingenuous at best. none of those agencies are security forces of any nature. There is no correlation between the volunteer and service type organizations and a security force.

put it in context: why does the US Dept. of Education , The Consumer Product Safety Commission, nd the Office Of personnel Management , to name a few have their own SWAT teams???
Many liberal news organizations reported this also. This wasnt some obscure quote taken out of context by some radical blog.

Last edited by Brian; 07/16/14 12:14 PM.

Brian
LTC, USA Ret.
NRA Patron Member
AHFGCA Life Member
USPSA Life Member


Brian #372822 07/16/14 12:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Fact Check is funded by the heirs to the Annenbergs and Bill Ayers chaired it is very biased to the socialist/progressive movement.

If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.
The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:

To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.

Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.


Hillary For Prison 2018
Page 9 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 25 (0.030s) Memory: 0.8220 MB (Peak: 1.8998 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-09-21 10:57:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS