December
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
1 members (Skeeterbd), 1,256 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,646
Posts563,699
Members14,602
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,574
Likes: 167
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,574
Likes: 167
Again from the Birmingham Proofhouse: 3 tons = 8,943 psi (approximate conversion to CIP transducer measurement). 4 tons = 11,913 psi. That's about the same difference that the Birmingham Proofhouse gives as the current spread between service pressure of an 850 bar gun (10,730 psi) and proof pressure of said gun (13,920 psi). Looks to me like somewhere along the line, service pressure and proof pressure got mixed up.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 534
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 534
Actually Tom, an oscilloscope would have been pretty hard to use on a non-repetitive event like this, especially in those days.
Other equipment were usable (e.g. chart recorders) but probably nowhere fast enough to be useful.
The advantage of the crusher, is that it has memory and removes this issues. It is also slow and distorts the results.
It is hard to grasp how some measurements were oh so difficult to make, not so long ago.
WC-

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
larry;
You just made my point exactly, though I think it was accidental. if you check back over what i have been saying Mr goddard did in fact give "Both" service & proof pressures. for the 2 5/8" chambering he gave the service pressure of 4Ľ tons (9500 lbs) & the proof pressure of 6.1 tons (13,700 lbs). This pretty well eliminates the possibility that he mistakenly recorded the proof pressures for the Service ones.
My main point however has been the pressures he listed simply do not mate up with the LUP's of British pressure of the era, but do very closely match what we now know as actual PSI's. As to exactly how he derived these pressures I do not know, but I think it imperative that we realize a gun proofed under these parameters "WAS NOT" proofed for a service load of 4Ľ LUP tons. This would actually be in excess of our modern SAAMI Spec loads.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,788
Likes: 475
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,788
Likes: 475


Ballistite maximum pressure at 1” was 4.9 Long Tons = 15,344 psi
Schultze at 1 1/2” was 4.5 Long Tons = 14,000 psi

"When this chart was published in the American Rifleman (minus the Ballistite Curve) in the 1950's they stated the load was a 3 dram or equivalent charge with 1 1/4 oz shot."

I believe AR was mistaken

From "Smokeless Shotgun Powders: Their Development, Composition and Ballistic Characteristics" by Wallace H Coxe; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 1933. Pressures reported for a 3 1/2 dram equivalent 1 1/4 oz. load:
DuPont bulk smokeless powder - 11,700 psi
Schultze bulk smokeless powder - 11,800 psi
28-grains of Ballistite - 12,600 psi




Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.095s Queries: 23 (0.073s) Memory: 0.8121 MB (Peak: 1.9022 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-12-02 06:52:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS