S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
0 members (),
655
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,489
Posts561,996
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 356 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 356 Likes: 4 |
My Birmingham boxlocks weigh 5# even, 5 # 2 oz and 5 #4.5 oz, all three were made in the early-to-mid-1930s.
Not sure that they are really better in the field than a 20b of similar weight, but they sure are interesting, and I am glad to have them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,768 Likes: 115
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,768 Likes: 115 |
Austin, it would be a couple of days before I could check the wall thickness on mine as I have to use a friend's gauge. Maybe Redoak has an idea about his. The 5 pound one is a very light example. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 803
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 803 |
No speculation, from my conversation with Frank Wiseman who now owns the Skimmin & Wood brand or his sons now own the brand because Frank was quite advanced in years when I talked with him. Sam Skimmin was a marketeer, he marketed guns all over the world in places such as New Zealand. He also developed tooling for the 2" 12 gauge action and marketed the gun. Those actions were jobbed out in Birmingham where the trade had gun makers that would specialized in stocks, barrels or what have you. Purchase the action, engrave and mark, put barrels and stock and sell. I have an A&F 2' 12, have an original 1939 A&F catalog listing the gun in two grades, so listed in A&F records and made for A&F by Tolley. Frank Wiseman's father worked fro Sam Skimmin off and on over the years and Sam gave him work when things were tough. When I asked Frank about Skimmin & Wood records, he replied, "You know, we had a War"! Lost in the Blitz. I asked Frank if he could make me a new 2" 12 and he replied that the tooling was lost. Rumor is that barrels may have been proofed and then honed to lighten the gun further, who knows? What I do know is that the 2" Brit boxlock 12, will not pass this way again.-Dick http://www.fjwiseman.co.uk/about.html
Last edited by Dick_dup1; 10/19/14 12:59 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 356 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 356 Likes: 4 |
Austin & Lagopus,
All 3 of my 2" guns have 26" barrels.
They spec out as follows:
A. Sanders, Maidstone, gun wgt. 5# 0.2 oz, bbl wgt. 2# 2.8 oz, min. wall @ end of chamber (@ start of forcing cone), Rt. .093", Lft. .088", 9" from breech, Rt. .030", Lft. 0.030".
H. Monk, Chester, gun wgt. 5# 1.7 oz, bbl wgt. 2# 3.5 oz, end of ch., Rt. .088", Lft. .090", 9" from breech, Rt. .035", Lft. .036".
W. Hodgson, Ripon, gun wgt. 5# 4.5 oz, bbl wgt. 2# 4.8 oz, end of ch., Rt..090", Lft. .092", 9" from breech, Rt. .039", Lft. .035"
These wall thicknesses were measured on a homemade device, but I believe that they are reasonably accurate.
The Sanders may (or may not) have been assembled by Skimmin & Wood, but I have reason to believe that the Monk & the Hodgson are by a different Birmingham maker.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165 |
Does anyone have a Brit 2" gun proofed under the 1954 ("tons") rules? Those guns were supposedly given a reduced level of proof, but I can't recall what the service pressure limit was other than that it was less than 3 tons. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,768 Likes: 115
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,768 Likes: 115 |
Redoak, Henry Monk is still in business in Chester http://henrymonkltd.co.uk/ I wonder if he has any information? Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 356 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 356 Likes: 4 |
Larry,
That would be interesting, wouldn't it? One would think that those 2" guns proofed under the 1954 rules that you mentioned could have been made even lighter yet. But perhaps the demand for lightweight guns had started to wane by then.
As I mentioned, my 2" guns are all proof marked in the 1930s.
|
|
|
|
|