I've had this 28 gauge hammer gun for awhile. It's a Liege United Arms. Does the stock and forearm appear to be 2 different kinds of wood to anyone else? If so, was it practice back in the day to use a cheaper grade of wood on the stock as opposed to the forearm? I thought maybe the stock was replaced but it appears to be the age of the rest of the gun and it looks like the screws have never been touched. Also, the fit of the locks and tang etc. is very well done. I can't see anyone going to that kind of trouble doing a replacement on a low cost gun. Or am I wrong and the forearm and stock are the same kind of wood only from maybe a different tree? I don't claim to be an expert on wood.