S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,517
Posts562,278
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 538 Likes: 2
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 538 Likes: 2 |
Thank you all. That is what I was looking for.
Tom C
�There are some who can live without wild things and some who cannot.� Aldo Leopold
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 820 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 820 Likes: 1 |
I shoot a Hammer gun that's .018 near the muzzle at doves and don't have a problem. I do shoot lite loads.
monty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573 Likes: 165 |
From "Modern Sporting Guns" by Christopher Austyn: "There is no legal minimum thickness for a shotgun barrel, although the British Gun Trade Association RECOMMEND 20 thousandths of an inch as a general minimum." (Emphasis the author's.)
As noted above, there are plenty of British game guns that left the maker with MBWT well under .035. As also noted above, the main issue with barrels (assuming good condition) as they approach .020 is what happens if you dent them. Likewise, the location of the thin spot is also important. Like Jeweler, I wouldn't be overly concerned with a gun slightly under .020 close to the muzzle. Pressure certainly wouldn't be an issue in that case.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,763 Likes: 462
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,763 Likes: 462 |
Just to clarify, the British .20" recommendation refers to 18" from the breech and beyond. Published data shows even a 3 Dr. Eq. of dense smokeless (Ballistite) runs less than 1500 psi at that point.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 928 Likes: 42
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 928 Likes: 42 |
Dr. Drew, .20 is for a .308.  Just kidding. We know you meant .020. Best, Bill
Bill Johnson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,854 Likes: 118
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,854 Likes: 118 |
I believe that I got this from Shotgun World under the Reloading Forum. There was a whole story on pressures and psi and the gentleman that wrote it did a lot of homework. Makes sense to me.
"Almost all shotgun powder burns within the first 2 inches of the chamber. A typical fast burning powder will burn in the first 3/4 inch of the chamber. This is where maximum chamber pressure is attained. A typical fast burning powder like Red Dot might give a chamber pressure with a certain load of about 10,000 psi at that point. This is why a chamber is very thick on a shotgun barrel back at the chamber and gradually becomes thinner as it gets further from the chamber."
There was a lot more written.
3/4 : 10,000 1 1/2 : 5,000 3 : 2,500 6 : 1,250 12 : 675 24 : 338 He stated that every inch multiplied by two the pressure dropped in half.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
He stated that every inch multiplied by two the pressure dropped in half. This statement would be true I believe if the volume exactly doubled "& IF" the temper stayed constant. In real life of course neither of these are true. The internal diameter of the hull will normally be of a larger diameter than the bore, plus the forcing cone will have more volume than the same length of bore. Although I do not have the means of measuring them I am quite certain the temperatures of the burning & expanding gases are not constant for the length of the bore. Pressure is relative to both volume & temperature. Max pressure is of course reached at the point where increasing volume of the chamber exceeds the expansion of the burning gases, but all the powder has not been burned at that exact point. The pressure therefore would not be expected to have fallen to half of the max at a point where twice the volume was reached from the point where the max occured. A look at recorded pressure curves of various burning rate powders will quickly show these exact ratios simply do not exist in the real world.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,763 Likes: 462
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,763 Likes: 462 |
This may be the thread David referenced http://www.shotgunworld.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=405370Most of the graphs are calculated/predicted numbers. I believe the pressure/time curve was interpolated to distance, not measured as such. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,854 Likes: 118
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,854 Likes: 118 |
Miller, he did mention temperature as one of the factors. Here is the whole thing that I copied and pasted for my records.
"Following is the best explanation of pressure and velocity versus length in a shotgun barrel that has ever been posted here.
Almost all shotgun powder burns within the first 2 inches of the chamber. A typical fast burning powder will burn in the first 3/4 inch of the chamber. This is where maximum chamber pressure is attained. A typical fast burning powder like Red Dot might give a chamber pressure with a certain load of about 10,000 psi at that point. This is why a chamber is very thick on a shotgun barrel back at the chamber and gradually becomes thinner as it gets further from the chamber.
After that first 3/4 inch, the pressure and temperature starts reducing. When the shot has travelled twice as far, then the already burned powder which is now gas has twice as much space available and the pressure therefore drops to 1/2 what it was at 3/4 inch travel.
So when the shot has traveled 1 1/2 inches the pressure drops to 5,000 psi if it was at 10,000 when the shot had traveled 3/4 inch and was at max chamber pressure.
Likewise when the shot travels twice as far again, to 3 inches the pressure drops to half again. So when the shot has traveled 3 inches the pressure is about 2500 psi.
This can be carried out on down the barrel and the pressure keep reducing by half as the shot travel doubles onward down the barrel. Here is a table giving shot travel vs pressure.
inches:pressure
3/4 : 10,000 1 1/2 : 5,000 3 : 2,500 6 : 1,250 12 : 675 24 : 338
So as you can see as the shot travels further down the barrel the pressure reduces. Since the pressure is very high early on, the shot accelerates rapidly early on. With 10,000 psi back initially it is accelerating very fast. Once it gets out to 24 inches though the pressure is only 338 psi, so the shot is accelerating very little after that point.
Adding barrel length does give extra velocity, but its not a lot once you have a barrel length approaching 30 inches. If you had a 2 inch barrel and increased it to 4 inches though your velocity increase would be very large. Increasing from 28 inches to 30 though might only give you about 10 feet per second.
If you make the barrel very long, say something like 8 feet the pressure has dropped so much that the gun hardly makes any noise. This barrel length thing is why an 18 inch riot barrel is so much louder than your 30 inch trap gun. The pressure wave let loose upon the air at 18 inches would be substantially higher than the pressure wave let loose from a 30 inch barrel.
The above explanation is not entirely accurate, because barrel pressure also drops with temperature as well as with getting more space available, and the powder is also cooling as pressure drops, but the above explanation is accurate enough to think of it that way as a close approximation."
Drew, that is a good post also but I think someone on Shotgun World got it from another site and posted it there.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
Yes the full explanation is much closer to actual facts. The main point I would still disagree with is that total combustion of the powder charge has been reached at the point of max pressure. While the above graph is based on time rather than distance the curves are very similar to those whch have been shown related to distance. In fact as best I recall I was the first one to mention these pressure curve graphs & lacking a photo program at the time scanned in a copy of the duPont one made in the 1920 with Black, Dupont Bulk Shotgun, Infallible & DuPont Oval as I recall which I sent to someone to post for me. This graph has surfaced many times since. "IF" that ratio of twice the volume = half the pressure were always the case then the load giving the lowest max pressure woulds "Always" give the lowest velocity. I think we all understand this is not the case. The "Fly in the Ointment" here is that the P:V ratio is not an exact constant & varies with the burning rate of the powder. As can be seen in the curves the slower powders continue to release more gases (Still Burning) for a bit longer past the point of max pressure than do the faster ones, though all do so to some extent.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|