doublegunshop.com - home Forums Anti-gun posts by ed good

The farmer got up one morning and decided he wanted bacon and eggs. After a heated negotiation with the chicken he settled for two of her eggs instead of three.

But the hog? That hard headed and intolerant rascal refused to budge an inch.

(jOe alert. jOe I was not making fun of you when I wrote the above. I know you are very stUpid and will probably misinterpret the intent and meaning of that comment so I am explaining it to you. This is to save you the embarrassment of making another very stupid post that doesn't have anything to do with anything. No need to thank me).

Ed, you'll not likely get answers. True believers know the answers and don't want to be accountable. They know the Second is a right of enduring debate.

To state the obvious here, the difference of opinion among originalists and living documentarists, makes a member anti-Second and anti-gun to zealots.

That assumption of itself is a lie. How many times have we heard it here?

The upper third best prez ever got what he qud eh? How come the misogynistic iranian torturer/murderer soleiamani got on a commercial flight to moscow in late July to discuss what russia gets in the deal. Just prior, during his hard sell sales tour, kerry, for bo, said about the quds forces strong man that the argreement specifically names him as not EVER coming off the high terror list. russians were completely aware he can't even travel, but they reap the rewards?

Speaking of those health-o-the-mom bunch. Did you catch the latest vid. Worker has to listen to a pp abortionist discuss the 'fine specimen' that's removed to a different room from the 'abortion' with heart beating to harvest the brain. Probably rape or incest, eh?

I'm a little disappointed King. ed says the 'right' is intact, doesn't he? Isn't he saying that 'licensing' means only those that can afford to pay, can play?

I would've thought you'd have a bit more compassion for those of modest means. And yes, good tactic, trivialize it so it's not really a right, just a football to kick around. Weird, huh?

"licensing' means only those that can afford to pay, can play?

no, not if a license was only required to possess a semi auto handgun...think of it in the spirit of the firearms act of 1934 and the no chil lef behin ed ucation law of 2001...and unlike the act of 1934, the licensing process would be administered by the states and not by the feds...an like no chil, compliance to a national standard would be mandated by the feds, but achieving compliance to the licensing act would be the responsibility of the states.

King Liar, once again you are lying about me and others who vote for pro-gun candidates. I have voted for many Democrats in my life, but unfortunately, most Democrat politicians support the same Leftist Socialist ant-gun dogma that you support. The 2nd Amendment is hardly the only litmus test we apply when choosing a candidate, but refuting, twisting, and rejecting one Constitutional Right naturally leads anyone with a brain to conclude that such a candidate would show a similar disrespect for the rest of the Constitution. And this has been borne out time and time again.

You, King Brown, keep pushing this notion of a living tree or living document interpretation of the Constitution. That would reduce the value of the document to nothing better than toilet paper, but it would allow Liberal Left Statists such as yourself to advance your agenda. People need to understand that those of your mindset are not our friends. Now why don't you go back to the King Brown Anti-Gunner thread where you wrongly accused me of lying about your illegal transport of a pistol in Canada and admit that it was you who once again lied to us? You really are a low class fraud.

Ed, I have answered your idiotic questions repeatedly in the past. You are obviously too stupid to comprehend. The local, state and federal measures that gunners and the NRA have ceded to in the past, or had rammed down our throats, have not worked and only emboldened the anti-gunner to always come back for more. There is no rational reason for debate or ever giving them another inch or another shred of our freedoms.

well keet, your post above is another example of your evasive rhetoric and smoke here... and your refusal to answer simple, yes, no or i'm not sure questions, is typical of your subversive performance here...it is a typical demacrat operatives tactic, where one does not say anything directly, but attempts to influence the opinions of others via suggestion and innuendo...first example i saw of this tactic was during the pres election of 1952, when da dems sent a flyer out that trashed the reputation of one dwight david eisenhower...low down then. low down now.

cum on keet, man up and answer da questions...

for your convenience, here are the questions...again:

do you see a difference between government regulation and prohibition of arms ownership?

does government regulation of arms violate the constitution? and if so, specifically how?

and does the long standing federal firearms act of 1934 violate the constitution?

do state laws regulating arms violate the constitution?

does licensing of semi auto handgun owners violate their constitutional rights?

and finally, is there a need to reduce the firepower in the hands of the people?

Hmmm, dialog. Trade a right for a license. My mistake, you intended the spirit of a free shall issue license, because that would decrease firepower. Yes or no?

Aside from the 'licensing' problems we have in regard to traffic fatalities, how about calif? Do you ship out that way? For the good of their residents, they run their own 'licensing' program. How come in kali if an illegal felon 'immigrant' is caught committing a felony with an illegal finearm, the charges are reduced to a misdemeanor and the perp walks. A shining example of states responsibility? Yes or no?

I answered your idiotic questions in the past Ed and will not waste my time doing so again just because you are too stupid to comprehend.

Our 2nd Amendment rights are not a topic for debate or discussion with someone who wishes to give up some or all of those rights. You are a complete idiot.

What do you think of your cowardly buddy King Brown running away from his lie about illegally using and transporting a pistol throughout Canada and even across the border, and then calling me a liar for writing about it? Here's a link to it:

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=371736&page=26

I provided PROOF that it was King that was lying again, and he refuses to respond. If King lives another 84 years, he still will not be a man.