Originally Posted By: Geo. Newbern
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: Geo. Newbern
Allied casualties in both world wars were indeed staggering before the USA came to either one. That is because they were losing...Geo


No, it's because they were wars that involved much of the world BUT the US until the US joined in. And millions and millions of people were in harms way in all theatres, whether as armed forces or civilian bystanders.




Gee whiz canvasback, you mean the allies were winning the wars before the USA ever got involved?...Geo


I thought you were a lawyer Geo.? Should be able to read and understand sentences, no?

Winning or losing in those wars, casualties were staggering before and after America's entrance. My point, clear as day, was that losing the war was not the cause of the casualties, fighting the war was.

Some of you seem to have gone to the John Wayne Movie School of History.


The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia