|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 members (Ted Schefelbein, prairie ghost, Mike Harrell, earlyriser, Lloyd3, SKB),
1,187
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,644
Posts563,686
Members14,602
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 871 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 871 Likes: 3 |
Over a decade ago I was asked to evaluate a 16 ga M-21 field. Brought my bore gauge and went over every nook. Original, sure, but what a unappealing 21. Finish to fitting to inletting - nothing to hold a candle to most any CSMC....or even to a prewar/transition gun.
It's not just 21s, or even just Winchester shotguns. Most late pre-64 models leave alot to be desired prep and finish-wise. This does not mean they are less valuable to a collector. Most VR M-42s are similarly afflicted, but they bring big coin. And why not? Collecting is mostly about condition and rarity.
About a year ago, Poulins auctioned a bunch of 42s. There were five superb post-market engraved guns. Not one went much within $2.5k less than a late postwar SR skeet gun that was as much a dog as that 16 ga 21. Lousy metal prep, mediocre inletting, but - yes - high original condition.
Nobody was wrong.
I don't get arguments such as we are seeing here. If you are a collector, you prioritize collectibility. If you are a shooter, you prioritize other things. The mistakes are made by collectors who cannot recognize original condition, and by shooters who desire their bespoke guns be appreciated by collectors.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/28/15 11:59 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bill schodlatz
|
12/29/15 12:25 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
GF1
|
12/29/15 12:34 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/29/15 01:04 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Stanton Hillis
|
12/29/15 01:21 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
KY Jon
|
12/29/15 02:02 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Bob Cash
|
12/29/15 02:19 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/29/15 02:35 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Bob Cash
|
12/29/15 02:54 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/29/15 03:06 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Gunflint Charlie
|
12/29/15 03:51 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
King Brown
|
12/29/15 04:01 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/29/15 03:27 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Remington40x
|
12/29/15 03:30 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/29/15 09:39 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Samuel_Hoggson
|
12/29/15 11:08 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/29/15 11:53 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
tudurgs
|
12/30/15 01:19 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/30/15 03:05 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
12/31/15 02:30 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Buzz
|
01/01/16 01:53 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/01/16 01:00 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Buzz
|
01/01/16 04:07 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Bob Cash
|
01/01/16 05:58 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/02/16 01:47 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bbman3
|
12/31/15 02:59 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
12/31/15 04:01 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Austin Hawthorne
|
01/01/16 12:29 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Bob Cash
|
01/01/16 01:40 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/01/16 02:29 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/01/16 01:05 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
old colonel
|
01/01/16 01:33 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
skeettx
|
01/01/16 03:19 AM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/01/16 04:39 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
GregSY
|
01/01/16 04:45 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Buzz
|
01/01/16 04:53 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/01/16 04:57 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/01/16 04:58 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Samuel_Hoggson
|
01/01/16 05:03 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Gunflint Charlie
|
01/01/16 06:34 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Buzz
|
01/01/16 06:55 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Gunflint Charlie
|
01/01/16 07:42 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/02/16 01:57 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
btdtst
|
01/01/16 07:32 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Gunflint Charlie
|
01/01/16 07:58 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/02/16 02:04 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/01/16 07:54 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/02/16 02:13 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/02/16 02:42 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Gunflint Charlie
|
01/02/16 03:29 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Sam Ogle
|
01/02/16 03:41 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
GaryW
|
01/02/16 08:41 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
bobski
|
01/02/16 09:06 PM
|
Re: model 21 field reports, not collectors
|
Dick_dup1
|
01/02/16 09:06 PM
|
|
|
|