February
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Who's Online Now
1 members (GETTEMANS), 499 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,866
Posts566,810
Members14,629
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
An added note I'll include about Washington barrels. There is an obvious lack of visible inclusions in the Wrought Iron. In general, they usually color fault-free. It appears that this may be due to the higher steel content of the tubes. This also may explain why the Riband welds color dark instead of white. DocDrew, have you tensile tested a Washington section? Scrap Washington tubes are hard to come by, but I'd hypothesize that they may be stronger due to the higher steel content.

It's possible that they may have been developed not only for their looks, but to provide stronger tubes as dense smokeless powders became more popular.

Regards
Ken

Last edited by Ken61; 05/11/16 09:13 AM.

I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 129
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 129
Quote:
The historic damascus barrels do not tend to show that stringing in the wrought, possible because of the amount that it was worked and or drawn out.


That is correct, Craig. The more wrought iron is worked, the more the silica content is dispersed and even worked out of the iron. Continually piling, welding and drawing out of wrought iron can bring it to nearly pure iron. In old gun barrels that were made of just wrought iron and scarf welded along their lengths, the silica strings are seldom visible. I believe these barrels were made of wrought iron that had been extensively worked before the iron was used to make the barrel.

I think the wrought iron used for damascus barrels was fairly high in silica content when it was first stacked into the billet. But after welding of the billet, drawing it out into small rods, twisting of the rods, welding the rods into a riband and welding of the barrel tube, a lot of the silica is removed and/or dispersed. I am certain that the high initial silica content was intentional, to aid all of the forge welding that was to ensue. But the barrel makers knew that the silica would be reduced and dispersed by the time the barrel forging was completed.

Quote:
The Original Parker Process calls for an initial etch, a five minute one with battery acid.


Ken, I noticed your comment on pre-etching from another thread. You may want to proceed with caution on etching the wrought samples that I sent you. I expect that if you subject them to a five minute etch, you will wind up with a coarse stringy looking surface. Actually, I doubt that an initial etch is necessary on the wrought samples or the 1002 steel, unless it serves to open the grain to accept the rusting acid.


Steve Culver
Steve Culver Knives
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Originally Posted By: Steve Culver
I think the wrought iron used for damascus barrels was fairly high in silica content when it was first stacked into the billet. But after welding of the billet, drawing it out into small rods, twisting of the rods, welding the rods into a riband and welding of the barrel tube, a lot of the silica is removed and/or dispersed. I am certain that the high initial silica content was intentional, to aid all of the forge welding that was to ensue. But the barrel makers knew that the silica would be reduced and dispersed by the time the barrel forging was completed.

That just makes so much sense. Almost a self fluxing weld with the silica.
I use borax to forge weld & it is the first thing to splash out of the join & fly in all directions. Go hot enough & hard enough & there is definitely none left in the joint.
Those boys really knew their jobs.
O.M

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Originally Posted By: Ken61
An added note I'll include about Washington barrels. There is an obvious lack of visible inclusions in the Wrought Iron. In general, they usually color fault-free. It appears that this may be due to the higher steel content of the tubes. This also may explain why the Riband welds color dark instead of white. DocDrew, have you tensile tested a Washington section? Scrap Washington tubes are hard to come by, but I'd hypothesize that they may be stronger due to the higher steel content.

It's possible that they may have been developed not only for their looks, but to provide stronger tubes as dense smokeless powders became more popular.


The steel industry in Belgium is changing at this point. They have contracts to build ships. In a few cases, men of war. Also the impact of WWI on the industry was showing. No doubt the changes in powder influenced a small part of the steel industry, barrels for small arms, but not nearly the financial influence of ship building.

Pete

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,869
Likes: 511
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,869
Likes: 511
Ken: I've only tested 3 Iron Crolle, Twist, Damascus-Twist, and a single 4 Iron Crolle segment. Without giving away all the good stuff wink the tensile strength was remarkably consistent at about 54,000 psi. That is just more than 1/2 the tensile strength of lowly Hunter Arms Armor steel.

BTW: It is my opinion that Etoile, "Washington", and Chain patterns use similar lopins/methodology. Check out the Remington 1894 barrels at the beginning here
http://www.picturetrail.com/sfx/album/view/18015717

and this very odd Smith barrel



I understand Bro. Steve is working on a Chain pattern barrel

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,265
Likes: 2043
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,265
Likes: 2043
Originally Posted By: moses
Originally Posted By: Steve Culver
I think the wrought iron used for damascus barrels was fairly high in silica content when it was first stacked into the billet. But after welding of the billet, drawing it out into small rods, twisting of the rods, welding the rods into a riband and welding of the barrel tube, a lot of the silica is removed and/or dispersed. I am certain that the high initial silica content was intentional, to aid all of the forge welding that was to ensue. But the barrel makers knew that the silica would be reduced and dispersed by the time the barrel forging was completed.

That just makes so much sense. Almost a self fluxing weld with the silica.
I use borax to forge weld & it is the first thing to splash out of the join & fly in all directions. Go hot enough & hard enough & there is definitely none left in the joint.
Those boys really knew their jobs.
O.M


This is fascinating. My thanks to Doc, Steve and all of you who have contributed expertise and insight to this issue.

Regarding the silica ......... I remember my Grandad telling me about a blacksmith shop that was here on our farm in the early 1900s. The river swamp was being logged and the huge virgin logs were brought out of the swamp and up on the hill by mules and what was called a log cart. It had a big axle under it, likely wrought iron. Grandaddy told of watching the 'smith weld those broken axles back together using white sand as flux. Isn't sand primarily silica?

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Originally Posted By: Drew Hause
Ken: I've only tested 3 Iron Crolle, Twist, Damascus-Twist, and a single 4 Iron Crolle segment. Without giving away all the good stuff wink the tensile strength was remarkably consistent at about 54,000 psi. That is just more than 1/2 the tensile strength of lowly Hunter Arms Armor steel.

BTW: It is my opinion that Etoile, "Washington", and Chain patterns use similar lopins/methodology. Check out the Remington 1894 barrels at the beginning here
http://www.picturetrail.com/sfx/album/view/18015717

and this very odd Smith barrel



I understand Bro. Steve is working on a Chain pattern barrel


Magnificent. Be aware, that pic of the Husqvarna set was only taken midprocess, I've just lacquered it, and will post a pic when totally done.

Regards
Ken


I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 129
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 129
Quote:
I use borax to forge weld & it is the first thing to splash out of the join & fly in all directions.


I use anhydrous borax in some of my forge welding work. However, I avoid using flux as much as possible. Flux creates the possibility of flux entrapment in a weld. My time making damascus is too precious to risk flaws in the steel. My steel pieces for damascus are always ground clean when stacked in a billet. After making a weld, I let the billet cool and then cut it up and grind the weld surfaces clean again before restacking. If I use anything at all for a “flux”, I use kerosene.

Quote:
Grandaddy told of watching the 'smith weld those broken axles back together using white sand as flux. Isn't sand primarily silica?


Sand or ground glass was often used as a flux. It works quite well, however it requires very high heat to melt. Around 2,600F degrees. Wrought iron can stand these high temperatures, but modern high carbon steel cannot. We weld modern steel at around 2,300F degrees. Most of today’s damascus smiths use propane forges. Propane forges struggle to reach 2,600 degrees. Coal forges can reach 3,000F.

Quote:
BTW: It is my opinion that Etoile, "Washington", and Chain patterns use similar lopins/methodology.


Etoile and Washington share similarities. But, chain pattern is vastly different. Chain pattern is very complex in how the lopin/billet is assembled. A hint to its complexity; there are six elements that create the chain links, organized around the four sides of the billet.
I’m certain that the old damascus experts were very good at creating new patterns. But chain is so complex, that I wonder if they actually knew how the pattern would turn out in the finished barrels. I don’t know what they were trying to make with that billet arrangement. But, it wouldn’t surprise me if they looked at a barrel made from this billet arrangement and then said; “Hey, it looks like a chain!”

Quote:
this very odd Smith barrel


A cool pattern indeed! Laying up a billet to create the little square elements would take some effort. But, this really isn’t a complicated pattern to make. I will add this photo to the ones that you already sent to me. I am hoping to publish a book on damascus barrel patterns, describing how each of them were made. One of my reasons for working out how to make chain pattern, is to affirm my knowledge on sorting out damascus patterns. If I can’t make it, how can I state that I understand how it is made?

Quote:
I understand Bro. Steve is working on a Chain pattern barrel


I am currently working on chain pattern, however it is first to be used to make a knife blade. As soon as I post this reply, I will be going out to the shop to continue my work on it. I am very interested in making a chain pattern barrel and have enough of this billet left to do so. But as a businessman, I have to justify the cost. There’s no point in making a barrel, unless you build an entire gun to install it on and shoot it. That is an expensive proposition. I still have the piece that I made, using the first damascus barrel that I made. Despite all of the attention and publicity that this piece has received, I have found no buyer for it. I’m trying to make a living from my work and cannot justify making expensive pieces that few have the funds to purchase. Without a customer to purchase, my work to actually make damascus barrels could cease.


Steve Culver
Steve Culver Knives
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,869
Likes: 511
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,869
Likes: 511
Keep at it brother! And many here certainly appreciate your efforts, starting with figuring out the lopin.

Previously posted, but relevant. Top: Washington or American Flag Left: Double 81 Bernard Middle: Extra-Fine Crolle Right: Chain



Of course how the lopin became the finished pattern is the hard part frown

And there were multiple patterns referred to as Etoile, Washington, and Chain or Chainette

This is the sample display of Joseph Juleinond de Nessonvaux

Interesting that the Chain segment appears with the Corche and Legia



Etoile and Washington variants



Desire Mineur, of Prayon, Liege, claimed exclusive rights to "Chain-pattern" damascus in 1904, and the process was no doubt a carefully controlled secret

Another interesting Chain pattern by LePage, with prominent 'Stars'



The creativity and artistry still astounds me!!

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 355
Likes: 16
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 355
Likes: 16
Germain I hope. From the 1933 "Modern Gunsmithing" by Clyde Baker. (A delightful book really.) Chapter 7, under sub-heading "A FEW SHOP KINKS", he states: "To distinguish between iron and steel, file the surface bright and apply a drop of pure nitric acid. After a minute or two, wash off with water. On wrought iron, the spot will be a pale ash gray; on steel a brownish black, and on cast iron a deep black."

As an aside, while I do not own anything with Damascus barrels, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading about the restorations and seeing the results can take one's breath away.

Page 7 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.203s Queries: 35 (0.170s) Memory: 0.8657 MB (Peak: 1.9021 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-02-08 07:33:18 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS