Is anyone here at all surprised to see King Brown once again defending the dishonesty of the most extreme Anti-Gun candidate for U.S. President? Here's another link to the viral video of some of Hillary Clinton's serial lies over the course of her political career:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016...goes_viral.html

Of course, King is here today to denigrate Trump and to repeat the view of the Liberal Left that Hillary's drumbeat of dishonesty is merely " usual career politician slipperiness but not lying."

Anyone who hasn't yet seen it should take a look and decide for themselves rather than relying on politically biased fact-checkers such as the Washington Post. Here's an article on a Politi-Fact review of the video that isn't so flattering and willing to make excuses for Hillary as the anti-gun Troll King Brown:

http://www.providencejournal.com/article/20160522/NEWS/160529808

Of course, King has in the past made excuses for the blatant lies of ex-NBC Reporter Lyin' Brian Williams, and even defended Obama's violations of his Oath of Office by saying:

Originally Posted By: King Brown
With respect, you tend to believe the written as something sacrosanct as it appears in the Constitution and other bills. Look at the Oath you posted: It says only that the president will do to "the best of my ability" to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. What he determines "best"---wrongly or rightly.


Will someone please tell me the difference between this type of "slipperiness" and dishonesty?

Oh, one other thing... Isn't this the same King Brown who was here only a couple weeks ago complaining about those who make political commentary here in Dave's sandbox??? Do as I say... not as I do... especially if the obvious goal is to support and defend an anti-gun politician!


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug