October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 621 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,496
Posts562,075
Members14,586
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 17 of 22 1 2 15 16 17 18 19 21 22
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 581
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 581
Originally Posted By: L. Brown




Reagan had ideas that caused him to be accused of being simplistic. Like on the Cold War: "We win, they lose!" But he had a plan to get there. And did. Trump, on the other hand . . . is attacking him an attack within the party? Is it an attack on a real Republican or a real conservative? Trump likes to point out that Reagan had once been a New Deal Democrat. But he came to political prominence giving speeches for Barry Goldwater, and had served as governor of California. His credentials were pretty clear. Trump has been a Republican and a conservative . . . maybe since the start of this election cycle? Most Republicans don't donate to the Clintons and Rahm Emmanuel.


Larry, I suspect if we got into the Way Back Machine and set it to 1979, we would find many, many articles and columns by the MSM and by the Democratic faithful espousing the view that Reagan is nothing more than a good photo op and sound bite.....with no real, sensible plans for anything. Just as they are doing now with Trump.

Trump has good ideas that are causing him to be viewed as simplistic and worse.

A moratorium on Islamic immigration until your vetting system can be assessed and improved where necessary. What is wrong with that? Is that really racist given what has been going on for 20 years or is it being framed that way by the press and talking heads?

Addressing in a real way the crisis of illegal immigration. What is wrong with that? Is that really racist given what has been going on for 20 years or is it being framed that way by the press and talking heads?

Examining your free trade agreements? What is wrong with that? Is that really economically foolish given what has been going on for 20 years or is it being framed that way by the press and talking heads?

Side note: I have been a strong supporter of Free Trade around the world for the last 25 years but I'm starting to question my own blind allegiance to the concept. On the plus side, it has destroyed the private sector unions in NA as a serious force especially in the auto sector. But are the job losses worth it? IMHO we were insane to sign an agreement with a country like Mexico without some kind of mechanism that levels the playing field regarding cost of living. It is undeniable that it is the dramatically lower cost of living in Mexico (and other countries like China, Viet Nam, India etc) that forms the basis for their ability to compete with so much lower wages. I support free trade between countries that are competing on the same basis. As Trump come out and says, we have been badly out-negotiated on these trade deals.


The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
SKB Online Content
Sidelock
***
Online Content
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
If someone could explain to me how an American worker is supposed to produce a product at a competitive wage when compared to a Chinese worker whose coast of living is a small fraction of ours here in America then maybe I might be more open to free trade. A fiasco of the biggest proportion, started under Bush 41 and expanded by every POUS since. I hardly agree with everything Trump says but he is 100% right in that we got screwed on those trade deals.


Firearms imports, consignments


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
It started under William Jefferson Clinton with NAFTA. Remember Ross Perot?

The US Chamber of Commerce promoted free trade through the Republicans.

The Democrats realized they could help poor people all over the world without their constituents realizing what was going on. And they were right with the exception of a few unions.

There is nothing Democrats like better than helping poor people all over the world. They are internationalists. I want a President that will put citizens first, the rest of the world second.



I am glad to be here.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
SKB Online Content
Sidelock
***
Online Content
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
No Mike,
it was SIGNED under Clinton, Bush 41 negotiated the deal during his term and Clinton got it through. Credit where credit is due.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement

added a link showing a nice picture of the proud parties signing things.....

Last edited by SKB; 05/27/16 09:02 AM.

Firearms imports, consignments


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
No signeeee, No NAFTA.



I am glad to be here.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
SKB Online Content
Sidelock
***
Online Content
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
Credit where it is due.....both parties own this mess. No Negotiation under Bush 41....No NAFTA


Firearms imports, consignments


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 581
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 581
US-Canada Free Trade deal reached in fall of 1987 and signed January 1988.

NAFTA deal reached at the end of 1992 and came into effect in January 1994.

Last edited by canvasback; 05/27/16 09:05 AM. Reason: spelling

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
"Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994.[7][8] Clinton, while signing the NAFTA bill, stated that 'NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement



I am glad to be here.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
SKB Online Content
Sidelock
***
Online Content
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 615
Now Mike quit taking the credit away from Bush 41....read the Wiki article. He clearly worked very hard to push forward his ideas....
you might not like it but Bush 41 was the driving force behind NAFTA and old Slick Willie just hammered in the final nail with a smile. Both parties can claim what a wonderful job they did destabilizing our economy and turning the middle class into paupers. They both should be proud.


Firearms imports, consignments


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
I think I edited this in after you read my post.

Originally Posted By: AmarilloMike


The US Chamber of Commerce promoted free trade through the Republicans.

The Democrats realized they could help poor people all over the world without their constituents realizing what was going on. And they were right with the exception of a few unions.

There is nothing Democrats like better than helping poor people all over the world. They are internationalists. I want a President that will put citizens first, the rest of the world second.



I am glad to be here.
Page 17 of 22 1 2 15 16 17 18 19 21 22

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.275s Queries: 35 (0.247s) Memory: 0.8700 MB (Peak: 1.9022 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-08 18:55:43 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS