October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
1 members (MattH), 466 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,500
Posts562,119
Members14,587
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572
Likes: 165
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572
Likes: 165
Originally Posted By: old colonel
Originally Posted By: Stan
" ............ That said, I really think that the initial purpose of this post was to provide proof that setback of pellets in a shot shell does occur, and the percentage of pellets in the load that are deformed increase as the bore diameter decreases, naysayers notwithstanding .......... and not that it necessarily makes huge differences at the target.


Stan you are correct

I agree set back and deformation does occur, I also agree that small bores experience it more than larger bores. I agree it does not necessarily make a huge difference.


Going back to Brister, he stresses the important difference in shot string between loads using hard vs soft shot. Here, I think, is where we come to the difference between the impact of deformation on a smallbore vs a 12ga. As noted, the obvious advantage of the 12 is that it can push a bigger load. Thus a heavier load with soft shot might perform as well as the lighter load of a smallbore with hard shot. But if you use soft shot in a smallbore, where you have fewer pellets to start with, then you're going to see more impact. I'd say that using quality loads with good components is more important when you're pushing less than an ounce of shot than when you're pushing 1 1/8 or more. Or at least that seems logical to me.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
2-piper Offline OP
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
This has to me at least been a very enjoyable discussion. now let me throw out one more little tid-bit for thought.
A .410" firing 11/32oz; a 28 with 5/8oz; a 20 with 3/4oz; a 16 with 7/8oz; a 12 with 1 1/8oz & a 10 with 1 1/4oz.
Anyone want to make a guess as to what all these loads have in common.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
Common aspect ratio?

DDA

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 20
tw Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 20
Ding Ding, A winner!

Sorry, Don. It was too hard not to do that;-)

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
2-piper Offline OP
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Right on; within a narrow range these loads all have near the same column length in a nominal size bore. It is also noted that these are pretty much what the standard loads were a decade or so either side of 1900 when powder was limited to black or the early Smokeless which all burned at similar rates.
As stated in a previous post it was the development of progressive shotshell powders beginning in the 1920'that allowed the smaller bores to be "Loaded Up" to heavier charges.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758
Likes: 460
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,758
Likes: 460
Bob Nichols, Editor, Arms and Ammunition Dept., Field & Stream in a letter dated Oct 1, 1940:

As regards the 16-gauge, I think the English loaders for a long time recommended 15/16 of an ounce of shot as being about as much as the 16 could handle with "good grace." I still think the 1 1/8-ounce maximum load in the 16-gauge is a cock-eyed load- because I don't see any sense in having the 16-gauge weigh more than 6 pounds- or 6 1/4 pounds at the most- and believe me, the 1 1/8 ounce load in front of 3 drams equivalent modern smokeless powder is just too heavy in recoil for the 6-pound gun.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 72
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 72
Originally Posted By: Drew Hause
Bob Nichols, Editor, Arms and Ammunition Dept., Field & Stream in a letter dated Oct 1, 1940:

As regards the 16-gauge, I think the English loaders for a long time recommended 15/16 of an ounce of shot as being about as much as the 16 could handle with "good grace." I still think the 1 1/8-ounce maximum load in the 16-gauge is a cock-eyed load- because I don't see any sense in having the 16-gauge weigh more than 6 pounds- or 6 1/4 pounds at the most- and believe me, the 1 1/8 ounce load in front of 3 drams equivalent modern smokeless powder is just too heavy in recoil for the 6-pound gun.


Dr, I am afraid I must disagree. For targets 1 oz is a fair limit for a 6lb sixteen, but for game (pheasant) I often shoot 1 1/8 and occasionally 1 1 1/4 out of my medium weight 16 (6lb).

I believe the classic rule of 96 to 1 applies for sustained shooting, half a dozen heavier loads every now and again will not kill you.

Last edited by old colonel; 06/08/16 09:02 PM. Reason: Spelling

Michael Dittamo
Topeka, KS
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 72
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 72
PS on clays I normally shoot 7/8ths


Michael Dittamo
Topeka, KS
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
2-piper Offline OP
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
I have fired factory 3" 1¼ oz loads from a 6¼ lb 20 gauge as well as handloaded low velocity 1¼ oz loads from a 16ga which was 2oz under 6lb. I would want to use neither for continuous firing but for spaced out shots in many hunting situations they were not at all uncomfortable.
Over the years I did seem to do some of my best shooting in the hunting field with guns in a 6½lb-7lb range. In this weight range the normal 3-1 1/8 loads were quite comfortable & up to 3¼-1¼ were no problem. In a 12ga of at least 6 3/4lb I had no problem with the 3 3/4-1¼ loads.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572
Likes: 165
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,572
Likes: 165
One reason the Brits focused on lighter loads for the 16ga: 2 1/2" chambers. That being said, even when the standard chamber length for the 16ga in this country was 2 9/16", a 1 1/8 oz load was available. And in 1940, the conversion from 2 9/16" to 2 3/4" chambers as standard had only taken place very recently. But our 16's, in general, have always been built heavier than Brit 16's. It's a pretty rare American 16 that weighs much under 6#.

My first classic double was a pre-WWII Sauer 16. I never put that gun on a scale, but I doubt it went much over 6#. Had the chambers punched to 2 3/4" (LONG before I knew better) and shot a whole lot of pheasants with that gun, mostly with the high brass 3 DE, 1 1/8 oz loads. Didn't shoot a lot of targets back then, but when I did, I reloaded the standard 1 oz formula for the 16. Not at all unpleasant for a couple rounds of skeet.

Last edited by L. Brown; 06/09/16 09:45 AM.
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.310s Queries: 35 (0.228s) Memory: 0.8500 MB (Peak: 1.9016 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-10 22:25:04 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS