February
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Who's Online Now
1 members (GETTEMANS), 499 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,866
Posts566,810
Members14,629
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,265
Likes: 2043
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,265
Likes: 2043
Thanks, Steven .........for the wealth of information you have published over the years that most of us who read you would never have attained. There are many here who have great admiration and respect for your gunmaking abilities, myself included. But, as for me, not so much your lack of forbearance and ability to disagree without insulting.

Don has never claimed to have broken any new ground, AFAIK, concerning gun handling characteristics. What he has done, with his "whirly gig", is quantified handling characteristics and created a data base. When used properly it can help us mere mortals who like the way a particular gun handles, and who need some guidance in being able to find another that handles nearly the same way. I know now, because of Don's patience in helping me understand it, that a gun does not have to weigh the same, have the same length barrels, or even be the same gauge to do so. A .410 can handle almost identically to a 12 ga. game gun ...... if the weight is in the right place(s).

No thanks, Steven ..........for your condescension. It does not become a man of your great talent and knowledge.

And, FWIW, I'm another who doesn't worship at the MM altar.

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 653
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 653
I enjoyed reading MM, but after taking too much to heart the writings of Jack O'Connor and almost getting turned into bear scat because I viewed them as gospel or near gospel anyways all writers are just fiction writers until I prove otherwise. I like fiction and more so with good pictures but until you know it is real it is just words written to make a living. Facts are fun but subject to interpretation.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 15
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 15
AM, immediate apology for giving of offense. It was not intended. I have reread my posts and realize that I let irritation into the tone of my words. Please, no offense meant. See below for some further explaination; facts, thoughts, and emotions.

Originally Posted By: AmarilloMike

GT Garwood and DDA have both measured the MOI of many shotguns. In my opinion the practice has produced interesting data and interesting facts about shotguns.

GT measured MOI at CG (center of gravity) with a torsional pendulum and multiplied the MOI by 1000 to produce three place whole numbers as he felt people related to them better than to small decimal numbers. I measure MOI at CG with a constant torque turntable and multiply by 10 to produce (mostly) single digit numbers which I call unmounted swing effort. It is my hope that people will be less intimidated by "swing effort" than by "moment of inertia." My unmounted swing effort of 1.5 for a typical Brit game gun is equal to GT's 150. I extended the use of MOI by calculating the MOI at butt as a useful indicator for "mounted swing effort." I'm not aware of GT doing this, although I'm sure he was capable of doing it.

I think DDA was scolding me for not making a more complete explanation of COG and MOI for the original poster.

AM, no intent to "scold" you. Mild irritation at GT for a statement I consider likely to lead people to untruths concerning the role of balance. Seems to me that GT was quite surprised at the general apathy in the UK toward his application of MOI to gun handling. For me, I'm astonished that MOI wasn't a standard specification for guns by 1900.

I don't think he was disputing GT Garwood's shotgun knowledge.

The man's knowledge was encyclopedic and he could write. To me, it is a crying shame he wasn't more widely distributed in the USA and paid more attention to in the UK. I would have saved me a lot of work.

I think you read his comment on McIntosh correctly and as he meant it.

Once, and once only, I tried (in all humility) to have a conversation with MM about gun handling. He summarily informed me that he already knew all there was to know about gun handling and, further, it was utterly impossible that I would ever contribute anything to gun knowledge. Yes, you are correct, and I did mean it. And, I do apologize for the typo of the double "n" in his name.



DDA

Last edited by Rocketman; 06/27/16 10:58 PM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,265
Likes: 2043
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,265
Likes: 2043
My apology to you, Don, for my statement that I did not know of any "new ground" you had broken. In hindsight, that reads like a slight, concerning your work, and I certainly did not mean it in that way at all. I did not realize Garwood had not addressed mounted swing effort.

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Hi Don:

Garwood's method actually yields a true MOI (about the center of balance). I have assumed yours would too. And that if you commandeered Dr. Who's Taurus and went back in time along with your "whirly gig" and measured MOIs with Garwood that you would get the same (within uncertainty) answer for the same gun.

Is that how you see it?

I got the part that you calculate the MOI about the buttplate ("swing effort") using the measured MOI about the COB.



I am glad to be here.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 653
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,896
Likes: 653
One fact that I know for certain is that until I buy a gun the MOI or COB or LOP or DAC is perfect and I can shoot it well without effort. Once bought it does not stay the same. While I like reading about attempts to explain the what or why of gun dynamics I think we all understand there is a lot of subjectivity to it. Your testing gives insight and helps explain things but guns are like kids. Each slightly different for some reason.

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Oh yeah.

This conversation definitely fits in with those discussions on chokes, choke performance, shot size selection, and guns with large or small DAHs.

But the data and the conversation still interest me.



I am glad to be here.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 236
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 236
Do you think George Digweed worries about COB CG and MOI?

Just learn to shoot.

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Nope.

I bet he picks up a gun and mounts it and knows by feel whether he likes it or not.

Of course he is taking a non numerical measurement of those values and comparing it to his usual gun.



I am glad to be here.
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 73
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 73
Originally Posted By: Old Joe
Do you think George Digweed worries about COB CG and MOI?

Just learn to shoot.


Bless you Joe. Yes, I will learn to shoot. And I think George Digweed thinks about everything, then closes it out, and then focuses and shoots.




The point of the initial question is about where the CoB should fall on this given gun. It is a purely subjective and speculative question.

The gun has been restocked and I believe the stocking might have added 5-6 ounces or so to the gun.

The gun has three weight barrels, other three weight barreled guns weigh in the 6lbs 8oz or so range, not 6lb 13oz range it currently sits at. Yet the gun balances where most of us normally think it should, on the hinge pin. Minor experiments at adding 5-6 ounces in the range of where the opposite weight falls shows it might have been 3/4 inches in front of the hinge pin if my theory is correct that the restocking changed it.

My research has shown me that Fox did custom guns with CoB in front of the hinge pin by as much a 1 inch (possibly more) so it is within the range of probability even a Sterlingworth could have been so built (this one was built with at least two barrels. I have written for a factory letter so we will see if there is anything in the old files. It is likely that those details if they existed will not be there.

I agree with what others have posted about shooting it for awhile to determine if the CoB agrees with me or not before altering. That the actual feel of the gun is more important than a particular CoB point.

I further agree that the CoB in relation to the trigger hand is more important than the hinge pin, but I caveat that statement with the added observation that it also depends on where one habitually places their hand on the forend. Ultimately as pointed out by Rocketman it is preference.

This gun is only a fowl weather back-up as I could not resist the three barrel set and I always regretted selling my Fox years ago. The questions about this gun and CoB are esoteric and part of what I do on every gun which is to make every observation possible and know all I can figure about them.

Last edited by old colonel; 06/28/16 12:22 PM.

Michael Dittamo
Topeka, KS
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.052s Queries: 34 (0.028s) Memory: 0.8568 MB (Peak: 1.9016 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-02-08 07:35:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS