....Some choose to make it partisanly political but the last word should be Brian's:
"I am disappointed that the ACGG did not mention that the regs are in regsrds to Military Firearms (defined as "defense articles" and "significant military equipment". NOT civilian firearms. Leaving this information out only adds to the problem of spreading misinformation."
I am disappointed that Brian does not see, as the ACGG does, that the definition of firearm and manufacture MAY have been changed. I'm disappointed that for all the speculating, the best course to take is probably for individuals to retain paid legal assistance to inquire about the applicability of a new regulation that's now barely a month old.
I'm disappointed that Brian, and you, won't provide any alternate course to follow. I respect Brian's opinion, but he never quite confirms that an individual ought to define 'defense articles' in their own way.
Would you happen to know, in a non political way, when the next firearms related regulation will come out? How will you know or not know if it will be related to what law abiding people currently believe to be civilian firearms?
