I interpret the definition of "Significant Military Equiptment" and "defense articles" to be firearms that are to be used by our military. Not civilians. I do not see how it can be interpreted any other way. But that is just me...
And i have said it before, this regulation does not effect as many as people make it out to. Do i agree with anything that regulates or restricts any business, be it one or many? NO. Do I say that i support the regs? NO.
It simply annoys me when things like this are looked at on just the surface and made out to be the end of the world when people say that "ALL" gunsmiths are effected by this when in actuality, the vast majority are not.
Again... Just the way i interpret what is written.
