S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
278
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,935
Posts550,892
Members14,460
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8 |
Looks like I scared princess away. You know for a bully you really are a b!tch. Just like the fat one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8 |
If Donald Trump really did break the law, I think any sane person would demand that he be punished for his crime, and jailed. It is not a disregard for the Constitution to demand that the law be followed. It is a disregard for the Constitution to ask that anyone, no matter who or what their position, should be above the law. Well if your really being honest with this statement you should contact your representatives to express your displeasure with this. Don't you have them on speed dial? http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/30/gop-blocks-probes-into-trump-russia-ties.html
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513 Likes: 408
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513 Likes: 408 |
Some would argue that threatening to use the executive branch of the government to jail one's political opponent's shows an even higher disregard for the US constitution. It's quite instructive that you are able to recognize Trump's transgressions, as inconsequential as they are to date. Goodness, he said bad words and behaved like a juvenile teenager showing off to Billy Bush. How evil. What a cad! Yet you deny what is plain to any and all but the most partisan among us......Hillary's remarkable series of lies and coverups regarding her emails. Never mind the question of WHY she is so desperate to keep those emails from both the public and the authorities. To suggest there has been an even handed assessment by law enforcement of her actions is really to encourage that what you seem to fear most of a Trump presidency...the debasement of the office by a self serving individual. The use of presidential authority for partisan and personal gain. Obama and Clinton make Richard Nixon look small time. I won't argue that Trump is the perfect candidate, or even a good one. But Clinton is undoubtedly a liar of staggering proportions, given to secrecy when secrecy isn't required and on record as being dismissive of the very people who support her. I really wonder about what goes on inside the heads of her supporters.....what new horrific behavior from her would allow you to take the blinders off. Quite remarkable.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 Likes: 1 |
I'll try to get this back on track. If anyone thinks CA and NJ gun laws are extremely restrictive just have a look at Puerto Rico's:
Puerto Rico had a very stringent and restrictive licensing process necessary in order to purchase a firearm in Puerto Rico, but portions of this scheme were ruled unconstitutional in a class action lawsuit in June 2015.[7] Judge Aníbal Lugo Irizarry ruled that some of the provisions in Puerto Rico's 404 Statute are unconstitutional and violate the individual and fundamental right conferred in the U.S.Constitution's 2nd amendment which guarantees the right to keep and bear arms. Judge Irizarry based his decision on the U.S. Supreme Court Heller decision. The case was brought by William Bermúdez and others in a class action suit. Judge Irizarry ruled that anyone wishing to acquire a firearm will only need to complete the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) form 4473, as currently required by U.S. Federal Law. The government of the Commonwealth appealed and the case is still under revision in Puerto Rican courts. If the decision stands, the ruling immediately would allow Puerto Rico's residents to purchase and carry a concealed firearm without requiring a permit. Up to this point, permits to purchase a firearm have required proof of "need" and a lengthy process, and permits to carry concealed firearms have been extremely difficult to obtain.
The current legal system has it that in order to get a weapons licence, a person needs to be 21, along with several other requirements. A person is required to present a sworn statement attesting to compliance with fiscal laws, purchase a $100 internal revenue stamp, submit 3 statements from community members who aren't related to them attesting to their good reputation, submit a signed application that is notarized, be fingerprinted and photographed, and submit a negative certificate of debt to the child support administration.[10] That process is just to be able to purchase firearms to store in a residence or business and not for a concealed carry permit. In order to acquire a concealed carry permit a person has to first have a Target shooting license and then appear before a Judge and present proof of a strong reason for a permit. Due to this process, in many cases concealed carry permit applications have been denied. As such Puerto Rico is considered to be an effective "No Issue" territory for concealed carry permits except for in exceptional cases despite the official "may issue" policy. In recent years there has been an uptick in weapons license applications with a 56% increase from 2013. The Puerto Rican Police attribute the increase to the fear of being targeted by criminals in Puerto Rico.
And please note that the Judge that overturned some of the worse of the Puerto Rican laws based it upon the US Supreme Court Heller decision. Clinton has publicly stated that she believes this Supreme Court decision was in error so what do you think she'll do about it if elected and she names a far left wing replacement Judge for Alito?
Oh and BTW: There is now evidence in Wikileaks that Alito was in fact assassinated.
Last edited by James M; 10/15/16 05:43 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8 |
I won't argue that Trump is the perfect candidate, or even a good one. But Clinton is undoubtedly a liar of staggering proportions, given to secrecy when secrecy isn't required and on record as being dismissive of the very people who support her.
I really wonder about what goes on inside the heads of her supporters.....what new horrific behavior from her would allow you to take the blinders off. Quite remarkable.
Another conclusion you hold to that is based off of a demonstrably false premise. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...mp-truth-o-met/And as for what goes on in our heads? The sky is the limit when you don't form conclusions from demonstrable false premises!
Last edited by nca225; 10/15/16 05:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,035 Likes: 8 |
And please note that the Judge that overturned some of the worse of the Puerto Rican laws based it upon the US Supreme Court Heller decision. Clinton has publicly stated that she believes this Supreme Court decision was in error so what do you think she'll do about it if elected and she names a far left wing replacement Judge for Alito?
Oh and BTW: There is now evidence in Wikileaks that Alito was in fact assassinated.
Alito is alive and well Herr Oberst.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,561 Likes: 249
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,561 Likes: 249 |
Some would argue that threatening to use the executive branch of the government to jail one's political opponent's shows an even higher disregard for the US constitution. ....What a cad!.... Sorry cback, I trimmed out the part that doesn't agree with pca's 'education'. Careful, don't tickle her, then she roars and the claws come out. Jim, we can poke fun at wiki leaks, but maybe we shouldn't forget that the hill campaign hasn't denied any of it, just blamed the russians. When hill goes low, she's willing to go lower, but she has a fan club that is educated not to care one bit about the facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 Likes: 1 |
Quote: "Jim, we can poke fun at wiki leaks, but maybe we shouldn't forget that the hill campaign hasn't denied any of it, just blamed the russians. When hill goes low, she's willing to go lower, but she has a fan club that is educated not to care one bit about the facts.
Craig: I understand that. However their goal is to corrupt every informational thread on here in the hopes others won't bother reading them. The only time I see the garbage they post is when one of you quotes them. it's the same technique used by the far left in denigrating facts that are quoted by responsible Americans. I sincerely wish Dave would toss these worthless liberal idiots off here and be done with it. Jim And BTW: Clinton is counting on the fact that the MSM will ignore Wikileaks and therefore her typical uninformed voters won't even know about the "democratic abuse."
And furthermore: Here's Scopes Cop Out on Clintons' use of the term "Sand n*gger".
"So while it's true that the term "sand [censored]" appeared in e-mail sent by Hillary Clinton, this term was not used by the former secretary of state to describe Muslims. Rather, it appeared in an opinion piece by an Israeli author about the death of a young man, which Clinton shared with others via e-mail."
I guess it's quite ok according to Snopes since she just FORWARDED it rather then uttering it herself? I wonder what most Blacks and Arabs would think about this if the MSM didn't bury it?
Last edited by James M; 10/15/16 06:46 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
A truth-o-meter???? You got to be kidding me? A truth-o-meter comparison between someone who has lied and destroyed evidence to cover up that lie is a felon and for anyone who doesn't see that is operating out of the realm of reality.
So how can a felon run for political office? Has corruption infiltrated every one of our government institutions? They are bound and determined to change the direction of this country even to the point of collusion with a felon, which, in itself, is a felony. Sad state of affairs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513 Likes: 408
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513 Likes: 408 |
I won't argue that Trump is the perfect candidate, or even a good one. But Clinton is undoubtedly a liar of staggering proportions, given to secrecy when secrecy isn't required and on record as being dismissive of the very people who support her.
I really wonder about what goes on inside the heads of her supporters.....what new horrific behavior from her would allow you to take the blinders off. Quite remarkable.
Another conclusion you hold to that is based off of a demonstrably false premise. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...mp-truth-o-met/And as for what goes on in our heads? The sky is the limit when you don't form conclusions from demonstrable false premises! What you continually miss and what to me is the most important aspect of both their lies is this: What is the lie about? Trump boasts excessively, minimizes embarrassing and stupid behavior and campaigns like a normal politician, lying and exaggerating about what he can actually accomplish if elected. Hillary Clinton lies about felonious activities while Secretary of State. Hillary Clinton lies about influence for sale while Secretary of State. Hillary Clinton lies about the circumstances when as Secretary of State her choices cost four brave and loyal Americans their lives. But for you, Trump's the bad guy. Like I said before, remarkable.
Last edited by canvasback; 10/16/16 09:41 AM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|