I thought I had made my point Keith, but apparently not. So what DO you think about calling someone a Libtard? How would you feel if you had a special needs brother, son or grandson?
Wow, that's easy. I'd feel that someone who was born mentally deficient would be justified because of their unfortunate congenital condition if they blindly supported anti-2nd Amendment politicians, or thought things such as doubling of the national debt to $19 1/2 trillion in 8 years and passing that debt on to our children and grandchildren was "cerebral and eloquent". I would also say that they probably shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a gun without strict adult supervision. Shall I go on? But when that kind of abject stupidity comes from those who pretend to be gun guys on a shotgun forum, I just call a spade a spade, and reproduce their anti-gun rhetoric so everyone knows where they are coming from. And I simply do not accept the silly idea that we should embrace those who stab us in the back by helping anti-gun politicians keep their perpetual attack on my Constitutional 2nd Amendment Right alive and well. I notice you seem to have a real problem with the term "Fudds" too. Are you telling us your sensitivity to the term "Fudds" is because you have a brother, son, or grandson who is locked in a perpetual hunt, attempting to shoot Bugs Bunny? Would you prefer terms like "Ostriches", or "Neville Chamberlain's" for those who sling their own derisive name calling? Or do you just wish to provide cover to Trojan Horses who undermine our right to keep and bear arms?
And I still notice how selective your feigned indignation is. I suppose quoting Scripture to somehow justify your own hypocrisy isn't "bringing reproach to the name of Jesus Christ." But that's not for me to judge, is it? That sort of "katakrino" is reserved for special holier than thou folks like you.
So tell us again... why did you remove your signature line...
"Personal attacks only reflect the inadequacy of the argument, and the character of the attacker."...after launching your own little personal attack in a decidedly off-topic thread that had nothing to do with dogs or doubleguns? And why did you feel the need to frame it in a drama laced imminent mission of mercy to remote and dangerous mountainous regions of Guatemala, and then remain right here, logging in and checking threads and making posts? It looks a bit like a cat trying to cover up crap on a marble floor at this point.
I've made my point once again. But you are welcome to keep doing your hermeneutics in order to prove to all of us that behavior that is wrong for Jim, Dave K., or me is somehow acceptable and proper for you and your select group of... what????... how about Deplorables? That seems to be politically correct these days.
