First DAL, you haven't been here long enough to know what I think and don't think and whether to make the judgement that I move in lock-step with "Republicans" on this site. Let me assure you, I don't. And I've taken the verbal abuse here to prove it if you care to research.

You know the old saying about making assumptions.

Second, you were baiting and you know it. Talk about not being objective. At least be honest with yourself.

Thirdly, if you truly wanted to "track" Trump's performance for an objective measure, as a few others have pointed out, don't you think we should wait until he is actually legally allowed to call himself President and have, you know, the power to do stuff? Then see what he does?

Seems to me everyone's who is anti Trump is running around making predictions and the last time the same people did that (earlier this month) they were incredibly wrong. The same folks got Brexit wrong too. The hubris that allows them to believe they have it right this time is incredible.

I have concerns about what Trump will actually do.

I had concerns about what Harper would do and was significantly disappointed by his turn at the wheel. I actually hoped that, in 2008, although I could not support Obama on the basis of a track record and resume so thin as to be non existent, he might surprise me and have a successful presidency. I wished him well. Sadly I was disappointed by a very ineffectual man with very ineffectual policies.

Going back to my initial response....don't you think we all will track his performance? Don't you think we should all shit on him if he turns out to be a do nothing president? I mean....what's your point?

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia