No playing with words James. It was all right there in the first half of my reply to his post. The second half of my reply was aimed at Larry and his older brother King, and their anti-lead history that they frequently attempt to deny. I didn't make any claims about knowing anything about Australian hunting regulations, and I sure as hell didn't try to pick any fights. I simply told him that we are not interested in anything that Australian laws pertaining to firearms might offer the U.S.--- beyond being an example that we should avoid.
I think most of us were aware that candidate Hillary Clinton proposed that we should modify our gun laws to be in line with the Australian example. It was on her campaign website as well. That is a huge reason why gun owners who actually can connect the dots voted for the guy who promised to respect our 2nd Amendment. But it didn't stop guys like King Brown from openly supporting her in spite of being aware of her views and her life-long record as a devout anti-gunner.
Thank you for pointing out King's penchant for obfuscation and diversion. I prefer to simply call it the dishonesty it is.
Lonesome should check out those Australian hunting regs before he goes punching any kangaroos. It may be illegal to use a lead weighted sap to close the deal.
Is it really too early for a drink? It is the weekend, after all! Make mine a bourbon and water. Why bourbon? I'm buying American! Cheers.
