Originally Posted By: King Brown
You're doing just fine, craig. I enjoy your company. On microagression, I was thinking today of my mother who said during her declining years---she died at 89---that she never had an ache or pain. It made me happy. I have enough experience with aging to believe she was lying. D'ya think I'd be a lying troll against the Second if I said I never have an ache or pain? It wouldn't be true but would make my huge family happy.


This one's a keeper for sure!

Only King Brown would tar his own Mother as a liar in order to justify his own rotten lies. I wonder who, exactly, King Brown thinks he is making happy by telling lies like these about the 2nd Amendment... repeatedly demonstrating that he is still in denial about the 2008 Heller and McDonald Supreme Court decisions? Well, I suppose he is making the Liberal Left politicians he supports very happy.

First we have him once again offering support for his notion that the 2nd Amendment was not intended to guarantee an Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms, actually lying about Constitutional Scholar Mark Levin's position on the matter:

Originally Posted By: King Brown
Levin and Stevens, on this evidence, appear to believe that the Second amendment should only apply only to those who keep and bear arms while serving in the militia, and not as an individual right. Stevens goes further in his book, saying democratic processes should decide on the matter, not the judges, as a remedy for "what every American can recognize as an ongoing national tragedy."


Then we have him here conceding after being confronted with the truth, that Mark Levin believed the Individual Right may have been on the Framer's minds... but that they neglected to "write it down."

Originally Posted By: King Brown
I believe what Levin says about the Second was in the the Founders' minds. The pity is they didn't write it down. They wanted to protect the states from federal interference, for sure. But the country is still wrangling with the Second to the point that courts are allowing various levels to regulate from popular vote.


But King knows damn well that they did indeed "write it down" in the Federalist Papers, in their writings, in their personal correspondence, and in contemporary editorials. King has been repeatedly educated on that matter for many years here, yet he always returns with his lies and denial of the truth.

Here's King's idea of supporting the 2nd Amendment:

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showthreaded&Number=369094

Here's a long 2007 thread where King was informed that the Framers did indeed "write it down.", and that The Right to Keep and Bear Arms was investigated in the Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary US Senate, 97th Congress second session 2/82.

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=40567&page=1

Then he has the gall to piously pretend that he supports the 2nd Amendment, now referring to his own Mother as a liar to justify it. Just when I thought my opinion of King couldn't get any lower, he finds a way to top himself.


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug