doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Off Topic, Keith diversion

Gladys, I mean old colonel, did you happen to see King Brown once again denigrating me as he piously denied ever even seeing a hint of anti-gun rhetoric in his 15 years of almost daily visits here?

I'm sure you also noticed that I had provided a QUOTEhe had made asserting that the RKBA was not the original intent of the Framers.

It is a verifiable fact that King has made this exact same false claim many times in the past. I know for a fact that he was making this claim long before I ever posted here. He was corrected by other men who actually care more about our Constitutional Rights than they do about some faggy notions of manners and decorum.

King then claimed to accept their proof that the Framers intended an Individual RKBA. But shortly thereafter, he reverted to his usual anti-2nd Amendment position. And to this very day, he proclaims that there is absolutely zero anti-gun sentiment on this forum.


Now you are being dishonest yourself about your motivations for attempting to suppress my pointing this out. And you falsely assert that I am doing this out of hate or because I am holding a grudge. You lower yourself to King Brown's level, and expect me to respect you and your wishes.

That is not either civil or good manners. It appears your actual intent is to enable repeated dishonesty and the perpetuation of the same false narrative preached by the likes of Chuck Schumer, Barrack Obama, and Barbara Boxer.

No, scratch that. It doesn't just appear that way... It really is that way. The last time you will see the anti-2nd Amendment rhetoric posted by King will be when I post them all as my memorial to him in the Silent Doubles forum. It is important for people to know and understand that it is common for anti-gun trolls to do their dirty work on firearms forums while posing as something they are not. The only question in my mind now is whether you attempt to suppress me because you are agenda driven... or just plain stupid.

Oldstarfire, You are correct in that this thread is an attack on Keith's postings in Stan's off topic thread. I did so rather than further pulling the thread he was driving off topic and conducting his normal 2nd Amendment assaults (out of context) etc, I started a separate thread

It is a free speech website which he uses to attack from a state of permanent angst.

It is in response to his attacks, not initiated by me independent of his actions, but in response to them

I do so fully identified and in polite forthright terms. Per normal there is no reciprocation of the same.

I do not agree with King's politics and have posted against his views. I don't like Ed's posts and have questioned his actions in context and without the verbosity of diversion. I have posted against poor reloading advice JM posted in clear and polite terms. I am not their buddy.

Trolling after them is acceptable to many as they are the unpopular anyhow.

It is possible to be civil on this board.

You seem to argue he can resurrect stuff and keep old fights alive forever with little connection to the topic of the moment. I deal with his actions here and avoid dragging the original thread as he so often does.

I offer cessation, he seems to hold he will have none of it.

I understand where you are coming from and try to answer your points.

I wish you the best.

Keith, you are actually right on King's line about 15 years of no anti gun people. I agree both you and I have different definitions of anti-gun than King does.

I guess by his view, in his community he classifies as pro-gun, versus Kansas or the entire US for that matter he would not. I thank God I live in the US.

Once you started that thread down hill it went to garbage, you after all raised the anti gun term first when you went after Ed, from there the devolution goes. It always seems to snowball.

You can't seem to help yourself, you now claim not to hate even while you prophesies attacking someone even when they are dead.

You can have the last word.

You said it all right there at the end of your post Gladys Kravitz, I mean old colonel.

I plan to post all of the anti-gun, anti-2nd Amendment, and anti-NRA QUOTES from King Brown that I have collected and saved in a memorial post dedicated to him in Silent Doubles when he croaks.

You see that as hatred, and as an attack. I see that as a legacy for him, and as a lesson for constant vigilance for those who'd rather think that we, the nation of gun owners, do not have Trojan Horses weakening us from within. There are devious, deceptive wolves in sheep's clothing here. And although you make silly excuses and deny it, you are doing all you can to suppress and/or stop me from exposing the anti-gun back-stabbers operating here under a guise of faux civility and pretending to be pro-gun.

King is proud of everything he has said here, and is about as dishonest as the Prince of Darkness when he solemnly proclaims that he has NEVER seen anything to suggest that anyone here... especially including himself... is anti-gun.

And you are going to great lengths to not just tolerate that sort of behavior... you are attempting to enable it. Your weak and infrequent (and obviously insincere) protests are vastly overshadowed by the great lengths you are taking to give anti-gun Trolls like King and Ed free reign here.

Oldstarfire saw right through you. Your silly campaign for manners and faux civility when we have internet Trolls frequently attempting to disrupt this forum and undermine our Constitutional Rights with anti-gun rhetoric speaks volumes about your actual motives.

Actions speak far louder than your words, which are often nearly unintelligible. The hypocrisy you religiously deny shines like a beacon. Have I told you why people like you disgust me?

After reading your caustic invasions of way too many threads,
It's really difficult for me to hear who you're telling me you are
because your actions are screaming so loudly.

How do you find the time to be so hateful?

After reading your opinion of my actions, and Oldstarfire's opinions of my actions, one is naturally led to wonder how two men could look at the same things and see something so totally and completely different.

To arrive logically at an answer, I suppose one would have to consider which observer was an ardent supporter of gun rights and vigilance pertaining to those rights... and which observer was a Left Coast Fudd.

Thanks for your thought provoking question Bob.

Oh my!
Vanity, thy name be Keith.
At least half a dozen of the usual suspects have been called out by name.
Why would you assume I was talking about you, I mentioned no one in particular?

Keith, I guess you knew the shoe fit when you read Bob's post.

Then again when reading statements like below who could discern anything save hatred and ill intent.



Maybe a rather sad reflection of your heart, maybe just words typed in anger?

Why do you see a "Memorial" to King's legacy here as hatred and ill intent? Do you see something wrong with King's anti-gun, anti-NRA, and anti-2nd Amendment verbiage Gladys, I mean old colonel?

He doesn't see anything at all wrong with it. He doesn't see anything anti-gun about it. Hell, he hasn't seen any hint of anti-gun in his entire 15 years here.

I believe that it is a sad reflection of your heart, and your actual intent, that you returned to this thread, after saying you were giving me the last word. It is just another example of you attempting to suppress any removal of the cloak of faux civility that is used to protect an anti-gun agenda.

It has become very obvious that you wish to enable the anti-gun rhetoric of guys like King and Ed.

I can see why you'd think "the shoe fit" when I read Bob's post. Uh, negative on that Gladys. I didn't reply immediately because I was busy at work. See my reply to Bob below...

Gee whiz Bob, that's got to be one of the dumbest questions we've seen here since the last time Ed Good asked about something.

I know you mentioned no one in particular. But anyone with half a brain (I guess that leaves you out) could see that this wasn't your first post within this thread. The first one was fully supportive of Gladys Kravitz's, I mean old colonel's, attack on me:



That hardly needed to be ad hominum since I was the sole subject of Gladys', I mean old colonel's off topic thread. The second one a couple days ago said this:



By the way, I did give you a thoughtful and polite reply to that request, along with a couple valid questions of my own for you. But you slipped out the back door, as many of our Libtards and closet Liberals are inclined to do so often, and returned a couple days later with this:



So why would anyone assume you were directing that towards me???

You call recognition of the obvious "Vanity". That shows us your level of intelligence Bob, and it further affirms your negative opinion of me. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out Bob... especially when every post that you have directed towards me over the last few years has been critical, derisive, and vitriolic. It's almost like the evidence that King Brown is anti-2nd Amendment... there's a big stinking pile that only an agenda driven hypocrite like Gladys could ignore or attempt to hide.

I know for a fact that I have, in the past, posted comments that were in agreement with you. I know I have made posts that complimented you on your nice collection of Model 21's. Those days are over Slick. A fool can see that Politeness Avenue, Civility Street, and Manners Road are all one-way streets around here.

The next time you wish to challenge me intellectually Bob, you ought to seek out the help of someone smarter than you. Might I suggest Jagermeister or Ed Good?