S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,574
Posts546,517
Members14,424
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131 |
I was surfing the internet the other day and ran across an article that was titled Top 10 American Shotguns (or something like that). The author listed LC Smith as one of the top ten, but what caught my eye was the statement that LC Smith was the only US maker that made shotguns with sidelocks.
I know this is not a true statement as I can name a few myself. Just out curiosity what other US shotgun makers made a hammerless sidelock shotgun?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,704 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,704 Likes: 103 |
Baker, Meriden, Crescent come immediately to mind...Geo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,595 Likes: 10
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,595 Likes: 10 |
Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131 |
Wasn't the Lefever's just a side plate?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13 |
Add Waverly Arms to the hammerless sidelocks. There were many hammer sidelock makers.
Early Lefever and Tobin were hybrid sidelock/sideplated guns with only the sears mounted to the plates.
H&A, Iver Johnson and Davenport were sideplated boxlocks.
Last edited by John E; 09/25/17 11:06 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,826 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,826 Likes: 12 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 195
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 195 |
Clark and Schneider and David Kirkwood
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,278 Likes: 531
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,278 Likes: 531 |
Ya, pretty much. Having sears mounted on the plates by no means qualifies a gun as a sidelock.
Kirkwood, Schneider, Golcher, etc weren't truly manufactured here were they?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,279 Likes: 210
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,279 Likes: 210 |
I think Sneider was made here. They had several sidelock designs. My Kirkwood has a Brit sourcing and Golcher , if you mean Thomas Golcher or one of the more modern Golchers, seem to be German from Lindner/Daly. Older Golchers, by other names, were parts suppliers, mainly from Britain.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13 |
J.C. DANE, Lacrosse Wisc. Made hammer guns. Did he build any hammerless?
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49 |
Don't forget the current sidelock production of Connecticut Shotgun with their A-10 O/U sidelocks and their high end Galazan custom models.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 94
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 94 |
How about Galazan - sxs and o/u
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,145 Likes: 37
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,145 Likes: 37 |
Someone may say not true sidelocks to some of these: Remington 1889 Aubrey Colt
Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760 |
Outside of Mr. Galazan's later guns, I don't believe there were ever any American guns produced with an intercepting sear sidelock. That would seem to be the point of the exercise of building a sidelock, and one would want it to be of the quality of several of the English produced sidelocks, say, Brazier, Chilton, etc. Calling a Tobin, among others, a sidelock, doesn't make it so.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 195
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 195 |
Based on the work of Bill McPhail and others I believe that there is very strong evidence that David Kirkwood did produce sidelocks (of course, the barrels were secured in Belgium or the UK) Best Berrien
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131 |
So, so far we have the following:
L.C. Smith Baker Meriden Crescent Waverly Arms Clark Schneider David Kirkwood Galazan
Still in question are: Rem 1889 Aubrey Colt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13 |
So, so far we have the following:
Still in question are: Rem 1889 Aubrey Colt Buck2, The OP's original inquiry was in reference to vintage American hammerless doubles, but some hammerguns were included in the conversation. The Aubrey is a Meriden F.A. gun, so yes. The Colt and Remington sidelocks are of the Hammer variety. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13 |
Outside of Mr. Galazan's later guns, I don't believe there were ever any American guns produced with an intercepting sear sidelock. That would seem to be the point of the exercise of building a sidelock, and one would want it to be of the quality of several of the English produced sidelocks, say, Brazier, Chilton, etc. Calling a Tobin, among others, a sidelock, doesn't make it so.
Best, Ted Ted, The pre-Batavia line sidelocks from Baker Gun & Forging Co. had intercepting sears. Tobin would not qualify given it is a sideplated boxlock with only the sears mounted to the plates. John
Last edited by John E; 09/26/17 08:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,390 Likes: 107
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,390 Likes: 107 |
Ted, there are various reasons for making a sidelock in addition to the intercepting sear. One is the ease of accessing the "guts" of the gun, especially if the locks are hand detachable. Another is leaving more "canvas" on which the engraver can do his thing (although that's also true of sideplated boxlocks). Another is that--at least per the British, who contributed so much to the development of the modern sxs--the sidelock is a superior design. And there are those who will contend that in general, you get better trigger pulls with a sidelock vs a boxlock.
But our gun industry focused on numbers with only a tiny percentage of their output represented by the "best" guns they made. In contrast, there were several British makers who made their names based on a much smaller number of "best" guns. So a very different approach to the business. In this country, no one ever adopted the business model of "best" guns only. Or mostly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,278 Likes: 531
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,278 Likes: 531 |
Isn't it odd that nobody truly knows for certain if Kirkwood, Schneider, , etc were actually manufactured here? No old pictures of the factory or workshops showing these guns being built, no articles written back then detailing their manufacture, nothing out there that positively confirms that they actually built guns from the ground up. I'm in the camp of putting a gun together from sourced parts doesn't necessarily make you a gun manufacturer or qualify it as being from the USA. One of the prettiest and well built "American" guns I've ever seen in person was built, put together , finished or brought into this country by George T. Abbey, Chicago. This gun was obviously English, can't be sure if it was brought to the USA in the white and Abbey finished it, or it was brought in as a completed gun. My guess is...it was finished and ready for action when it left England.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131 |
So, so far we have the following:
Still in question are: Rem 1889 Aubrey Colt Buck2, The OP's original inquiry was in reference to vintage American hammerless doubles, but some hammerguns were included in the conversation. The Aubrey is a Meriden F.A. gun, so yes. The Colt and Remington sidelocks are of the Hammer variety. John Ok, thanks So, we are back to the following: L.C. Smith Baker Meriden Crescent Waverly Arms Clark Schneider David Kirkwood Galazan Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,595 Likes: 10
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,595 Likes: 10 |
Isn't it odd that nobody truly knows for certain if Kirkwood, Schneider, , etc were actually manufactured here? No old pictures of the factory or workshops showing these guns being built, no articles written back then detailing their manufacture, nothing out there that positively confirms that they actually built guns from the ground up. I'm in the camp of putting a gun together from sourced parts doesn't necessarily make you a gun manufacturer or qualify it as being from the USA.
Yet, today if you drill a single hole in an existing action the Fed.gov considers you a firearms manufacturer.
Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,354 Likes: 395
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,354 Likes: 395 |
Isn't it odd that nobody truly knows for certain if Kirkwood, Schneider, , etc were actually manufactured here? No old pictures of the factory or workshops showing these guns being built, no articles written back then detailing their manufacture, nothing out there that positively confirms that they actually built guns from the ground up. I'm in the camp of putting a gun together from sourced parts doesn't necessarily make you a gun manufacturer or qualify it as being from the USA.
Yet, today if you drill a single hole in an existing action the Fed.gov considers you a firearms manufacturer. That is only because fools vote for Liberal Anti-Gun Democrats. Know your enemy!
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760 |
Outside of Mr. Galazan's later guns, I don't believe there were ever any American guns produced with an intercepting sear sidelock. That would seem to be the point of the exercise of building a sidelock, and one would want it to be of the quality of several of the English produced sidelocks, say, Brazier, Chilton, etc. Calling a Tobin, among others, a sidelock, doesn't make it so.
Best, Ted Ted, The pre-Batavia line sidelocks from Baker Gun & Forging Co. had intercepting sears. Tobin would not qualify given it is a sideplated boxlock with only the sears mounted to the plates. John John, Not quite. The graded Bakers had hammer blocks, a different concept entirely, and one that is dependant on the gun being in the upright position to function. Intercepting sears function in any position. If you have ever had a Baker, or, for that matter, any US sidelock apart on a bench next to an English vesion with even a run-of-the-mill set of locks from the makers I quoted, above, you will see a distinct difference in level of finish and quality. Calling a Tobin a boxlock really isn't correct, either. If you take the worst, and weakest features from both sidelock and boxlock design, and combine them, you have a Tobin. Which, was good enough when all loads were black powder loads. Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,279 Likes: 210
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,279 Likes: 210 |
Ted, your thoughts about the Baker with hammer blocks needing to be in the upright position for the hammer blocks to function is incorrect. I'm not sure where you got that idea, but the blocks do block the hammers, in all gun positions, unless the triggers are pulled. When the trigger is pulled, the hammer blocks rotate to the side allowing the hammer to strike the firing pin.
As to the fit and finish of an American gun compared to a British gun, you are generally right. But, don't you think one might expect this, since the British guns cost several multiples of the American guns? You might compare Fords and Bentleys in the manner you suggest. How many Fords can you buy for the price of a Bentley ?
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 09/26/17 04:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760 |
Ted, there are various reasons for making a sidelock in addition to the intercepting sear. One is the ease of accessing the "guts" of the gun, especially if the locks are hand detachable. Another is leaving more "canvas" on which the engraver can do his thing (although that's also true of sideplated boxlocks). Another is that--at least per the British, who contributed so much to the development of the modern sxs--the sidelock is a superior design. And there are those who will contend that in general, you get better trigger pulls with a sidelock vs a boxlock.
But our gun industry focused on numbers with only a tiny percentage of their output represented by the "best" guns they made. In contrast, there were several British makers who made their names based on a much smaller number of "best" guns. So a very different approach to the business. In this country, no one ever adopted the business model of "best" guns only. Or mostly. Larry, I was thinking in terms of good reasons. The shear numbers of guns built on the boxlock design, in contrast to the numbers of sidelocks, that function perfectly, 50-150 years after they were produced, sans maintenance of their "guts", to use your term, would seem to throw so much cold water on the notion that being able to see them more easily is an advantage. Engraving, much like the "canvas" of the design of gun it is applied to, is very subjective. I have seen stunning examples of engraving on either design, and, much more that was not so. On both types of guns. I wish people who can't do it would stop trying to do gamescene engraving. Not everyone is Winston Churchill I have seen good, and horrific trigger pulls in all types of guns. I will suggest, that, at least in the case of English guns, a sidelock would have more time spent by a higher skilled worker on it's triggers than you might expect on a keeper's boxlock. There would be exceptions, but, not often. That doesn't mean a boxlock can't have wonderful triggers. Far from it. A hammerless sidelock is simply a hammer gun with it's hammers on the inside. As to it being the best or not, comes down to who built it, and not the name that is on it. We have seen examples of "name" guns, that are not the best examples of what said name was supposed to stand for. Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760 |
Dayrl, I saw a basket case Baker action that the blocks would fall out of position when the action was turned upside down. Perhaps the mechanism was worn enough to allow that? Sorry if I mistook that for how they all operate. In any case, they are not "intercepting sears". Different device, entirely. Do you have a good photo of a correctly funtioning graded Baker action? I'd love to see it.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,279 Likes: 210
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,279 Likes: 210 |
Ted, you need to start looking at decent guns, not basket cases. I doubt one could wear out a Baker firing pin block in a lifetime, even it one tried. Here's a schematic of the mechanism. Both intercepting sears and the Baker firing pin block perform the task of stopping the gun from firing when the trigger has not been pulled. Maybe a comparison of the two designs might make the Baker more positive in that function.
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 09/26/17 04:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760 |
Thanks for the photo, Dayrl. I'd guess a few parts were missing in the example I saw at a gunshow. That said, one has to look at a graded Baker when one has the chance, in my part of the world. And I've yet to see a Baker that has lockwork on the level of Chilton or Brazier, which, is not to say it doesn't exist, but, that it didn't get produced at that level on most of the Baker guns.
As to the costs of guns, American vs English, you mentioned, above, circa 1912, a Parker D grade was around $100, and a Jeffrey #3 boxlock was 28 pounds, without ejectors. 34 pounds with ejectors. About the same price. If I was selling, today, I'd want the Parker, but, to use, the Jeffrey would be the keeper, hands down. 100% coverage engraving in decent scroll, no stick men or flying turnips in sight, and much better fit and finish, especially to internal parts.
The internals on most American guns are not in the same league with English and European guns of the same era.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,390 Likes: 107
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,390 Likes: 107 |
Ted, boxlocks are less expensive to produce. That's why more of them have been made. Pretty simple explanation. But you can't escape the fact that if you're over in the UK shooting driven birds and it's more than a bit damp--the weather being that way over there--then there are definite advantages to being able to pull the locks and make sure everything is dried out, etc.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,778 Likes: 760 |
Over here in Realville, Larry, there is a definite advantage to a Benelli Nova for hunting in the rain.
Truly, I've seen some English keepers boxlock guns that had zero finish remaining, checkering that was worn nearly smooth, and other signs of heavy use, that were ready for their next century, even if it didn't start out with someone looking at the bits.
Quite impressive service.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,992 Likes: 302
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,992 Likes: 302 |
Union Firearms Co. hammerless appears to be a sidelock
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 515 Likes: 13 |
Union Firearms Co. hammerless appears to be a sidelock CZ, There are two variants of the Colton and at least two Union SxS models also. Don't know about the early Colton or the late Union model but the two guns I have are very similar. I had always assumed the Union SxS's were a hybrid lock. Your post got me thinking so I grabbed each (Colton & Union) and pulled a plate. Unconventional, but a sidelock. Colton(top) and Union F.A.(lower) doubles. I believe the Union to be a Model 22. P_20170926_200642 by John Eurom, on Flickr The Colton: Coil spring with inline hammers. Floating FP in frame. P_20170926_201131 by John Eurom, on Flickr P_20170926_201235 by John Eurom, on Flickr Union F.A.: Much the same as the Colton but the cocking bellcrank is mounted to the lockplate also and the parts are secured with a bridle. P_20170926_201600 by John Eurom, on Flickr P_20170926_201657 by John Eurom, on Flickr The mechanism is somewhat unique, wouldn't you all agree? John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
I was surfing the internet the other day and ran across an article that was titled Top 10 American Shotguns (or something like that). The author listed LC Smith as one of the top ten, but what caught my eye was the statement that LC Smith was the only US maker that made shotguns with sidelocks.
I know this is not a true statement as I can name a few myself. Just out curiosity what other US shotgun makers made a hammerless sidelock shotgun? A wonderful alternative to what John E. has shown us would be seldom found English-made sidelock from Vickers Sons & Maxim Ltd. known as Imperiale. Just like what John E showed us the lock mechanism was powered by a coil spring (in English lock it was dual purpose coil spring and sear spring). This made for simple, reliable and less expensive shotgun. Period adds state it came with nice Vickers steel barrels. They also made machine guns and airplanes. I would like to find one of them Imperials myself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 131 |
Added Colton and Union to the list.
L.C. Smith Baker Meriden Crescent Waverly Arms Clark Schneider David Kirkwood Galazan Union firearms Co. Colton
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1 |
Have my grandfather's 12 gauge Elgin Arms Company side-by-side which he purchased in the mid-1920's. It is a genuine sidelock and I still use it for bird and rabbit hunting from time to time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,354 Likes: 395
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,354 Likes: 395 |
How about the shotguns built by John Nichols or Nichols and Lefever?
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 830 Likes: 37
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 830 Likes: 37 |
John thanks for posting on this
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110 |
Lets correct the spelling. It is Sneider.
|
|
|
|
|