Originally Posted By: ed good
....is it as some have suggested: that tolerating mass murder with firearms, is the price we all pay, to protect our second amendment rights?....

....by now you should have figured out that personal attacks just weaken any argument you might advance...

try rational thought and discussion of alternative ideas....

I wonder if there can be civil discourse about why folks like you are susceptible to sensational ideological headlines? Shouldn't all violent crime be not only illegal, but unacceptable? You can quantify it if you want, the bigger the scoop of illegal, the more unacceptable? Can there be civil discourse about disclosing your true agenda, or does that require overlooking because of some claim to be on the high road?