|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,493
Posts562,055
Members14,586
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,462 Likes: 89 |
Breaking news...The NRA agrees with me. You defenders getting out of the NRA ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,786 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,786 Likes: 673 |
Breaking news...The NRA agrees with me. You defenders getting out of the NRA ? For a minute there, I thought King Brown had returned with his thoughts.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,604 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,604 Likes: 12 |
Breaking news...The NRA agrees with me. You defenders getting out of the NRA ? 
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,673 Likes: 580
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,673 Likes: 580 |
jOe's suggestion (and the NRA's position) is actually pretty reasonable.
Until you consider that it's just a way-station on the way to a total removal of guns from private hands. No accommodation is enough. If it were, I'd be all for it. But those people will never give up until all guns are in the hands of the government. Not a happy thought.
Last edited by canvasback; 10/06/17 10:16 AM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
I don't know what the problem is, the ATF granted these stocks under Obama because of the disability guidelines in the regulation, so they can simply reverse their decision on that regulation, interpretation of the regulation and NOT interpretation of the law, and say no.
No new law is required.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 312 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 312 Likes: 1 |
RIGIDITY is not always a virtue...
I support banning bump-stocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 342
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 342 |
The NRA didn't say they agree with banning bump stocks, they agreed to discuss it.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,604 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,604 Likes: 12 |
I don't know what the problem is, the ATF granted these stocks under Obama because of the disability guidelines in the regulation, so they can simply reverse their decision on that regulation, interpretation of the regulation and NOT interpretation of the law, and say no.
No new law is required. Yep.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
I mean I was always getting yelled at by our lawyers, "That's the regulation not the law."
Right????
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,604 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,604 Likes: 12 |
I support banning bump-stocks.
Why? What do gunowners gain from such a ban?
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
