|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,555
Posts562,737
Members14,594
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,542 Likes: 606
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,542 Likes: 606 |
that .348 will kill anything that moves. Good choice! Now, what style of rear sight does it have? The receiver sight or does it ride on the bolt? The latter can have some durability issues so, as I heard it, the receiver sight was used on later versions because it held up better. Not sure if this is true, but that's the story from someone that had one. As for missing out, don't grieve for me, I'm about to put down a bid on something I really "need". 
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
03/16/18 01:04 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Recoil Rob
|
03/16/18 01:28 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
03/16/18 02:40 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/16/18 12:26 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
skeettx
|
03/16/18 01:55 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/16/18 02:36 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
03/16/18 02:41 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/16/18 12:26 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/16/18 02:41 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Greg G
|
03/17/18 12:49 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Ken Nelson
|
03/16/18 01:31 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
CJ Dawe
|
03/16/18 03:31 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
SKB
|
03/16/18 03:41 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
03/16/18 08:36 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
CJ Dawe
|
03/16/18 10:08 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
03/16/18 08:39 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Ken Nelson
|
03/20/18 03:20 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
03/16/18 04:30 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/16/18 06:08 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
03/17/18 02:21 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
SKB
|
03/16/18 08:06 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/17/18 02:40 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Cameron
|
03/17/18 01:13 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/19/18 02:33 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
03/19/18 03:51 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Gary D.
|
03/19/18 05:28 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
skeettx
|
03/19/18 06:37 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
03/20/18 03:34 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
03/19/18 06:47 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/03/18 12:19 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
04/03/18 12:51 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/03/18 03:23 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
04/03/18 03:10 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/03/18 11:39 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
04/03/18 11:45 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/04/18 01:10 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
04/04/18 04:19 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
04/04/18 01:17 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Vall
|
04/04/18 04:18 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/04/18 06:45 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
BrentD, Prof
|
04/04/18 06:48 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/05/18 02:08 AM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Remington40x
|
04/05/18 01:23 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
RedofTX
|
04/07/18 07:53 PM
|
Re: Older Lever - 1871, 1886, others?
|
Chukarman
|
04/12/18 02:12 AM
|
|
|
|