LeFusil....sorry you continue to be wrong. On Reilly you are just repeating bromides and homilies you've read for the last 30 years...and most of what has been written about that firm is flat out erroneous as I've detailed repeatedly. You've done no research on Reilly and apparently you won't bother to read the work others have done. Again sorry - I don't want to create a flame-war but on Reilly you have no credibility.
Now, once you get around to reading the Reilly line, and the new history or Reilly....I'll be glad to answer questions posed about why I wrote what I did.
