S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (prairie ghost),
498
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,910
Posts550,659
Members14,458
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 255 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 255 Likes: 3 |
A friend of mine picked up a decent 12 gauge Greener with 26" barrels at a local gun show for $400. Apparently, somebody had just sold it to the seller for $250. Odd things happen I guess. Greeners seem to go for somewhat higher prices on Guns International, I've noticed. It has older British proofs and the flats say "Not for ball," but there is apparently no mention of the chambering. Is there any way to tell without access to a gunsmith? He sent me this photo:
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,554 Likes: 184
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,554 Likes: 184 |
QUICK way, roll up a 3x5 index card and insert into the chamber, see how far it sides in with out due force.
Second way is to use a chamber gauge
Third way is to check the proof marks more closely and then assume it is 2 1/2 " chamber or even 2 " chamber
Mike
Last edited by skeettx; 02/19/19 01:16 PM.
USAF RET 1971-95
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 667 Likes: 51
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 667 Likes: 51 |
Not scientific at all, but I have used a fired 2 3/4 shell as a proxy for a chamber gauge on suspected 2 1/2 inch guns. On the guns that I had "tested", that appeared to indicate original 2 1/2 chambering.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355 Likes: 11
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 355 Likes: 11 |
You can just stock a tape measure straight in against the wall until it hits the front. Note the measurement as where is comes to the inner lip where the shell brass rests.
Where you really need a gauge is in checking chokes.
- NDG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133 |
A chamber gauge does come in pretty handy. Not very expensive. But in the case of that Greener . . . being marked "not for ball", that would make it a 19th century gun. Too old to have the chamber length stamped as one of the official proofmarks. (That didn't happen until 1925.) But on a gun that old, the gun would almost certainly have left the factory with 2 1/2" chambers . . . although there's always a possibility, on older guns you find here in the States, that they have been lengthened to 2 3/4". 2" wouldn't be possible. The 2" 12 came along later, well into the 20th century.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,467 Likes: 487
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,467 Likes: 487 |
I just answered this same question in the current "Chamber Length" thread, and explained why I much prefer Miller's oft recommended use of a simple inexpensive 6" machinists scale over 3" x 5" cards, fancy brass tapered chamber gauges, or fired shells. You can read that reply in my post here: https://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=538330#Post538330As you can see from this illustration of a 12 gauge chamber, the length of the chamber is from the breech end to the transition where the forcing cone begins:
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593 |
Also look for the specific words stamped on the barrel flats, NITRO PROOF. If not there then it is a black powder gun & will have the crossed halberds mark in conjunction with the not for ball. Not for ball indicates a black powder proof unless the gun was reproofed & re stamped accordingly.
O.M
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 747 Likes: 24
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 747 Likes: 24 |
That's definitely and older Greener. You need to have the chambers and barrel wall thickness measured properly. Then use loads appropriate for a gun of that vintage. Don't half ass it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,381 Likes: 1319
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,381 Likes: 1319 |
A 6" machinists scale works as reliably as anything I have found. It is repeatable. Been using that method for many years.
Good reminder on having the BWT measured, tho'.
SRH
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
Whether it is "Nominal" 2½" or 2 3/4" actually has little to do with its age or whether it has only black or smokeless proof as well. Many nominal 2½" British guns, in reality, had either 2 9/16 (65mm) or 2 5/8" (67mm) chambers. What actually determined the chamber length was the gun's intended purpose. Game Guns normally had the short chambers, with Pigeon or waterfowl having longer chambers, up to as long as 3¼" (82.5mm). I recall Nash Buckingham mentioning using a Greener hammer gun of his father's back in the 1880s which had 3¼" chambers.
Larry was correct that the chamber length was not marked at that point. Measuring it will tell you what it has "Now". If the gun weighs in less than 7 lbs the odds are it started life with the shorter chambers even if they are longer now. I don't recall for certain when the 2" chamber was introduced, but don't think it goes back far enough to have been used in a gun stamped "Not For Ball".
I highly recommend the 6" flexible scale method. You cannot accurately "Feel" the start of a normal cone, but you can hold the barrels up to a light source, not overly bright though, & looking through the bore measure to the shadow line keeping the scale along the inner wall & where you can see it.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
|