Originally Posted By: bladeswitcher
Originally Posted By: Stan
That's right. That's why an unlicensed person wants to send the gun to a FFL in another state. So, what does that person do when the potential buyer says that the seller does not need a copy of the receiving FFL's license, because he is not a FFL holder himself?

SRH


If I understand your question correctly, the guy needs to reprogram his understanding. If he's not an FFL, he needs to get over the false notion that he needs a copy of the receiving FFL's license.



An unlicensed person does NOT need a copy of the receiving FFLs license. He only needs the first-three and last-five digits in the receiving FFL's license. With that information, he can go to the ATF's FFL EZ-Check website and confirm that he's shipping the gun to a valid license holder.

That's all there is to it. Get the numbers. Look them up on EZ-Check. Ship the gun to the address that EZ-Check provides. THAT'S WHAT THE EZ CHECK WEBSITE IS FOR! It really is that simple.


Okay, but how would you suggest to a seller that he "reprogram" his understanding? And, what is the problem with him insisting on a signed copy of the receiving FFL's license, when that receiving FFL has no problem with sending it, and it is not illegal for him to ask for it? I know, you said the FFl holder "should consider" providing only his number, but it is not Illegal for him to provide a signed copy. So, what's the big deal?

Two answers, please.

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.