S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
4 members (SKB, Buzz, R. Glenz, eeb),
248
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,557
Posts546,283
Members14,423
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8 |
The first step, anywhere, is dividing owners into groups. Then, chiseling away at individual groups, one at a time. When you are thinking to yourself, I dont use an AR to hunt with anyway you are already firmly in the grasp of the jaws of the trap. They want whatever you are using to hunt with, the attempt to get someones AR is just a step on the way to that.
There are many who post right here who are too stupid to connect the dots.
Best, Ted This is so fundamentally obvious it is stunning anyone doesn't get it. Just look at the historical actions that have taken place and are taking place in other countries.....Canada for example. There is no accommodation that can be made that isn't on the road to confiscation. First comes licensing, then comes registration and that is followed by confiscation. They may attempt to do it inside of two years or they may take 50 years to try it do it. But that's what's happening. The remarkable thing is that the same people who think only the government should have guns are the first to complain about LEO's overstepping their mandate. Splitting people into groups to divide them...Kinda like right from this playbook huh? Now here's a question for you ed.. And rocky mtn bill, and our other libtards:
What do you think would save the most lives and have the greatest effect on reducing violent crime???
A) Passing a law which would stop old guys like you from owning AR-15's
B) Passing laws which allow cops to stop and frisk gang-bangers and young black and Hispanic males between ages 16 and 40.
We already know that Stop and Frisk would have a greater benefit on violent crime reduction. It was proven to work in New York City and other places. But the same Liberals who want stricter gun laws that affect law abiding citizens scream bloody murder about violating the Constitutional rights of minorities by enacting Stop and Frisk.
It really isn't about saving lives then. It's about taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights and our guns. Up here in Toronto they call it carding. After the black community with their liberal white enablers demonized it as racist, the Metro Toronto Police vowed to stop doing it. Since they stopped, gang violence and shootings have skyrocketed. So predictable. So dumb. So woke.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,464 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,464 Likes: 212 |
Yes....Its my understanding that New Zealand has some world class trout fishing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396 |
The first step, anywhere, is dividing owners into groups. Then, chiseling away at individual groups, one at a time. When you are thinking to yourself, I dont use an AR to hunt with anyway you are already firmly in the grasp of the jaws of the trap. They want whatever you are using to hunt with, the attempt to get someones AR is just a step on the way to that.
There are many who post right here who are too stupid to connect the dots.
Best, Ted This is so fundamentally obvious it is stunning anyone doesn't get it. Just look at the historical actions that have taken place and are taking place in other countries.....Canada for example. There is no accommodation that can be made that isn't on the road to confiscation. First comes licensing, then comes registration and that is followed by confiscation. They may attempt to do it inside of two years or they may take 50 years to try it do it. But that's what's happening. The remarkable thing is that the same people who think only the government should have guns are the first to complain about LEO's overstepping their mandate. Splitting people into groups to divide them...Kinda like right from this playbook huh? Now here's a question for you ed.. And rocky mtn bill, and our other libtards:
What do you think would save the most lives and have the greatest effect on reducing violent crime???
A) Passing a law which would stop old guys like you from owning AR-15's
B) Passing laws which allow cops to stop and frisk gang-bangers and young black and Hispanic males between ages 16 and 40.
We already know that Stop and Frisk would have a greater benefit on violent crime reduction. It was proven to work in New York City and other places. But the same Liberals who want stricter gun laws that affect law abiding citizens scream bloody murder about violating the Constitutional rights of minorities by enacting Stop and Frisk.
It really isn't about saving lives then. It's about taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights and our guns. Up here in Toronto they call it carding. After the black community with their liberal white enablers demonized it as racist, the Metro Toronto Police vowed to stop doing it. Since they stopped, gang violence and shootings have skyrocketed. So predictable. So dumb. So woke. Yeah sure. That's it. Directly comparable. Law abiding legal gun owners and gang members. Good try nca.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8 |
Well CB, it still is dividing people into groups. And what was the criteria for being labeled a gang member? Membership card or color of their skin?
Not trying to be a pain, just pointing out that dividing people into groups doesn't seem to be only in the purview of the opposition.
And how does 2nd amendment purity testing prevent splitting gun owners into groups?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396 |
This is so obvious.
One group is law abiding and acting in a legal manner having complied with the rules.
The other group, by their behavior and appearance, aligns themselves with gangs. They exhibit suspicious behavior....the equivalent to a drunk driver weaving down the road. Why shouldn't they be checked out?
Despite the bad rap the word has received.....there is some value in certain "prejudices". From the concept of "pre judging". Looks like a fish, smells like a fish. Good chance it is a fish.
Last edited by canvasback; 01/10/20 05:38 PM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,032 Likes: 8 |
I think what is obvious is that splitting people into groups is human nature, right or wrong. Can't really chalk it up to just a strategy from the opposition if its human nature and something we all engage in. And please don't mistake me, I wasn't trying to call you out on something, other than a pot calling the kettle black.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,772 Likes: 758
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,772 Likes: 758 |
I think it is obvious that splitting people into groups to deny them God given rights is fundamentally wrong. You dont want to exercise the right, that is your business. But, you, like it or not, should have nothing to say or do about mine.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,498 Likes: 396 |
Nca, there is no pot and kettle here. Just a dope trying to score points by making a logical leap that doesnt work. Sorry buddy. Better luck next time.
Last edited by canvasback; 01/11/20 12:20 AM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 77 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 77 Likes: 1 |
I don't know much about politics or policies in New Zealand, but,I know Virginia is what you get when you elect Democrats.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,464 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,464 Likes: 212 |
....And how does 2nd amendment purity testing prevent splitting gun owners into groups? Who cares, with friends like you who needs.... The 2nd purity test ensures, a strong economy, international respect, the concept of sovereign borders, consequences for breaking the law not for using a plastic straw, not being a puppet of soros, not having to pretend to agree with aoc, not having to pretend ilhan's a US citizen. In the dead of winter, only a 2nd purity policy maker will ensure your right to babble on like a summer's eve.
|
|
|
|
|