So, King, lets get this straight. You are OK with banning AR style firearms for Canadiens based on what fact? You dont like how they look? The high prevalence of their use in Canadien crimes? Let us be honest with the facts for a moment-how many assault weapons have been used in Canadien crimes? (The correct answer is zero, nada, none, zip.) What could possibly be the rationale for banning them in a country where every, single, gun owner is computer background checked EVERY SINGLE DAY (no such system in place for actual convicted Canadien criminals, which, makes me feel a little better about the Patriot Act, but, I digress),
What is it, exactly, King? Ive always sorta felt the differences between an AR and, say, a Ruger 10-22 dont really manifest themselves until about the 40 yard mark, one was about like the other prior to that. You are OK with one, and not the other?
Why are you OK with legislation to criminalize legal gun owners across the entire width of Canada, over about 200 deaths a year, that often occur with smuggled or otherwise illegally owned, non AR platform weapons? How many people do drunks kill every year with cars in Canada, or, doctors, due to negligence?
This is not a a question where I expect to sit and read a leftist societal hairball that you spit up for general consumption by us toothless, confederate flag waving AR slinging yanks. I want to know why you have an axe to grind about what makes an AR platform so dangerous, so vilified, and so worthy of being outlawed in a society where it is almost of no impact at all.
Best,
Ted
____________________________________________
This outa be cute. I like that spelling of those people who live up there as much as King hates people owning ARs.
Tip of the hat to a friend of mine that I havent met.
