October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
5 members (LRF, KDGJ, SKB, 2 invisible), 206 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,954
Posts551,164
Members14,462
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350

I like all the points of discussion and craig's last about clarification seems justified. Tocqueville, Madison and the others weren't activists. They knew not to upset privileged positions. They knew all about amendments---14th and 15th with far more clarity than the 2nd, which has allowed lower jurisdictions to challenge it successfully should they decide to. Trudeau is musing turning federal gun reform from exclusively federal to municipalities.

What surprises me is not hearing much of minorities overturning majorities. I reported here last year that I couldn't find a pulse in shooting organizations about looming gun control, from gun clubs, gun shops, even from my die-hard conservative friends with whom I hunt regularly. In a democratic system, everything should be possible.

Here's an example. Some politically powerful recreationally groups democratically took over our province's Land Resources Coordinating Committee. Legislation permitting access of motor vehicles to all private lands without the owners' permission was at the Queen's Printer. City folk who liked to return home on weekends with mud-splattered vehicles were in heaven. They had more rights than those who paid taxes on their lands. And more votes.

Landowners didn't have to organize for this one. Or petition. Or write letters to legislators who allowed it to happen. It took only a half-dozen phone calls to the right people; first to the Girl Guides and Boy Scouts. "Do you want unannounced leather-jacket crowds at your summer camps?" Then to head of the provincial campgrounds association with similar message, then to the forest community: "Are we letting them run wild in ATVs over our managed lands?"

It took one week at no cost to turn an aroused rural minority into a majority. Government caved; it couldn't stand the heat from urban and rural concerned with social justice. Should the AR lobby want to keep their guns, they need to want them more than those who oppose them. I've seen no sign of it. I'm not getting my knickers in a knot over it.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,475
Likes: 491
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,475
Likes: 491
The bumper crop of pure horse shit in King's last post reminds me of how an ancient old Apple tree will sometimes produce one last large crop at the end of it's life.

Look at his moronic and dishonest statement comparing the 14th and 15th Amendments to the 2nd Amendment concerning "clarity".

This is a common ploy used by anti-gun Liberal Left Democrats, who say that the original intent of the Framers was unclear when they wrote the perfectly clear and simple words that protect and guarantee that THE RIGHT of the PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. They also explicitly defined the Militia, and the intent was equally clear that this right to bear arms for self and common defense had nothing to do with what firearms may be deemed appropriate to hunt deer or ducks.

King pretends that the 2nd Amendment permits or allows lower courts to infringe upon our gun rights, and to subvert the freedom of law abiding citizens. Nothing could be further from the truth, and King obviously continues his denial of two landmark U. S. Supreme Court decisions that overturned many of those unconstitutional infringements.

The Heller decision was made by a 5 to 4 margin in 2008. The McDonald decision was made by a 5 to 4 margin in 2010. Both cases are settled law, and in both cases, the 4 justices who voted to deny our Individual 2nd Amendment Rights were nominated by Liberal Left Democrats. It matters a great deal who gets a seat on the Supreme Court. A vote for a Democrat Presidential candidate is a vote to erode or eliminate our gun rights.

Most importantly, King intentionally neglects to tell us that virtually all of those lower court infringements, and nearly all of the unconstitutional anti-gun legislation has come directly from the Liberal Left Democrats and anti-2nd Amendment politicians that he and rocky mtn bill support.

King also acts as if there is little or no opposition to the recent Canadian anti-gun laws. But a quick Google search is all it takes to show that is simply another of King's many lies. This is a fraud and Troll who lies as easily and often as most men breathe.

It is high time that legitimate gun owners and shooters understand that not everyone who owns a gun, or speaks enough bullshit, is our friend. Guys like King and rocky mtn bill are the enemy who help to ensure that your children and grandchildren will not have a 2nd Amendment Right. And it's a real shame that there are not more guys here with the guts to stand up and put them in their place.


A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
Ted, Craig: The inanimate object is all the same to you but not to the maniac choosing how to kill as many innocents as possible. The Organ Grinder has never said how much he's damaged by not being able to own and operate a bazooka. Let's take up a collection and send him some pansies.


If you have a maniac with a gun, that is the problem, bill, not the gun. When you assume everyone is a maniac, that is called projection, a fairly serious mental issue, actually, but, a good therapist can help you get over it.

Best,
Ted

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Originally Posted By: lonesome roads
Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein
Originally Posted By: lonesome roads
Originally Posted By: keith
Yeah Lonesome, King does have the knack for dodging and weaving better than any 89 year old on earth.

His response to my last post, and Ted's question about AR-15 rifles was almost exactly what I expected... a lot of lies, a lot of fluff, and a lot of crap from his inflated self-image.
.


I was just going to tell Ted his argument would pack more punch if he added a couple of paragraphs on how great he is. Throw in some fancy words too, Ted.

In Detroit riding a Super Cub.
Facing Windsor dreaming of hockey. Poor guy was about to jump.


_________________________
Forgot the carton of Chesterfields.


A guy could do a lot worse then Detroit, a Super Cub, and Chesterfields.

Best,
Ted

___________________________________________
Just dont ask me how.


The guy at the CIA could tell you. They get Dunkin and its a non-smoking building.

The CIA recruited former 2600s after they left the service. Not that we were anything special, mostly because we had a clearance. Had a buddy join. Lasted about 2 months. Told me he thought the Marine Corps sucked but this was another level.


__________________________
Embrace the suck, CIA guy.
https://youtu.be/8BN4gKJsP54


Probably right when your buddy got to the part where you sign your remaining soul over to Satan in order to complete the spook training. Yea, this sucks, I quit.

It takes special people to be spooks.

Best,
Ted

_________________________________________________

Or, Terminators. 30 years and you get the watch, a cake, and shown the door.

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,563
Likes: 251
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,563
Likes: 251
Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
Ted, Craig: The inanimate object is all the same to you but not to the maniac choosing how to kill as many innocents as possible. The Organ Grinder has never said how much he's damaged by not being able to own and operate a bazooka. Let's take up a collection and send him some pansies.


....a fairly serious mental issue, actually, but, a good therapist can help you get over it.

Best,
Ted

I dunno Ted, Bill is old school. He'd probably ask his friends for a referral to their 'therapist'. Firstbreak through is focus on the pansies and implant some latent feelings. Within a couple of weeks, he'll be wearing a big tropical sun hat, gussied up like the toppings on a bespoke mai tai. Next breakthrough, he'll start up here about how the world shrink organization is anti AR.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Originally Posted By: King Brown
Ted, humans are complicated, all of us. Here's my personal take, using example of my life in public affairs. I'm from a long line of activists, grandfather early assistant to founder Salvation Army and later director of Gipsy Smith, leading evangelist of his times, grandmother a vote-demanding suffragette, my father a communist in early 20s during Depression when anyone not thinking of a better way wasn't thinking at all.

I was National Councillor of the American Newspaper Guild, in early days of setting up separate and independent branch in Canada, and later the national CWSG, led the English section of the producers' strike which successfully wrested control of Radio Canada, French sector of Canada's public broadcaster, from the autocratic premier Duplessis. All concerned with social welfare of workers. Currently president of a provincial woodlot owners organization.

My interest is social justice in the workplace, healthier and happier communities through cooperation, peerless consultation at the heart of it. The results are satisfactory. Now, the complication, a seeming contradiction. I've participated with gun owners to get rid of the gun registry and protect gun rights. I regard ARs as affectations---"a studied display of artificiality of manner"---and an egregious part of our flagrant consumerism.

That's just me. If gun owners want to keep them, they'll struggle as I did for what I considered the public interest. I will be no part of theirs. Brotherhood has never demanded lock-step; it accommodates wisdom and ignorance in different ways. Consider also that my principal interests are advancing needs of minority groups and AR owners may be one of them. I'm picking my battles while agreeing with you on your mentioned contradictions.

Like a loyal and conscientious Republican or Democrat saying no, enough is enough, eh?



I specifically asked that you not wretch a hairball for us to consume.

Fat chance. The use of terms like activism and social justice in your reply clearly demonstrate the notion that you are trying to justify your contempt for those that have differing viewpoints then your own. I would expect you would be able, at this point in life, to simply man up and spit out an opinion that was your own, and based on some sort of facts, related to the discussion.

My expectation would be wrong, however.

Best,
Ted

____________________________________________
The drilled and welded Francotte side lock tells it all, King.

https://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=571593#Post571593

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 604
Likes: 34
Hal Offline OP
Sidelock
OP Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 604
Likes: 34
Is the individual right to defend self and loved ones not germane to this thread? Can such a natural right be unduly restricted by regulations?

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,715
Likes: 114
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,715
Likes: 114
Originally Posted By: Hal
Is the individual right to defend self and loved ones not germane to this thread? Can such a natural right be unduly restricted by regulations?


Yes, as far as I can tell that particular right is the crux of the entire gun control issue...Geo

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 898
Sometimes we assume too much:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/20985-self-defense-in-the-uk-is-illegal

Throughout history, it appears any notion of rights that one might have in England, the UK and the other places where the crown is held in higher esteem than a citizen would be, depends entirely on your position of birth. Subjects have little in the way of actual rights.

Best,
Ted

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513
Likes: 408
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513
Likes: 408
Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein
Sometimes we assume too much:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/20985-self-defense-in-the-uk-is-illegal

Throughout history, it appears any notion of rights that one might have in England, the UK and the other places where the crown is held in higher esteem than a citizen would be, depends entirely on your position of birth. Subjects have little in the way of actual rights.

Best,
Ted


What? You think you don't have your own form of royalty that gets special privileges? The only difference in America is the inheritance is money and political status, not blood.

"Hi officer, my name is Ted Kennedy. What seems to be the problem? Chappa what? Hmmm not familiar with that bridge. "


Last edited by canvasback; 05/09/20 08:22 PM.

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.076s Queries: 35 (0.053s) Memory: 0.8647 MB (Peak: 1.8990 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-10-05 13:16:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS