|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,555
Posts562,703
Members14,593
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,946 Likes: 345
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,946 Likes: 345 |
james-l,
I'm sure many( if not most) are machined, that would be the easiest way to do it with correct tooling on a production basis. For a "one off" modification, drilling and setting a pin in would be the easiest way, IMO.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1 |
Mike I'm sure you are right however it looks like a carbine staff will work,they are close to the correct length and have a provision for the spring. main difference as near as I can see is the range markings, the photo in Olsons book is in yards or meters, the military ones I guess are marked in mils. Got one on order, we'll see.
I learn something every day, and a lot of times it's that what I learned the day before was wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,946 Likes: 345
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,946 Likes: 345 |
james-l,
You might be right, I hope so.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1 |
Happy to report that a sight from a 1909 Argentine carbine was a perfect match except for the range markings, even has the correct spring which is different than a rifle sight.
Jim A.
I learn something every day, and a lot of times it's that what I learned the day before was wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,347 Likes: 77
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,347 Likes: 77 |
Good, I hope you will post pictures of your rifle.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,274 Likes: 1 |
I learn something every day, and a lot of times it's that what I learned the day before was wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
