S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 members (SKB, AP Smith),
522
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,576
Posts546,570
Members14,424
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 56 Likes: 37
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 56 Likes: 37 |
Dave Erickson, You did good. I bought a case of BIS-Maxx when I first got my big BSS. It was okay - about like a high-speed steel load. The new Kent Bismuth is actually much better and significantly cheaper. Since then, I got Briley thin-walled tubes installed. If Kent had come out with Bismuth before I got the tubes installed then I probably would have left it a M/F gun and stayed with Bismuth.
Last edited by Rubberhead; 06/23/20 09:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,200 Likes: 1172
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,200 Likes: 1172 |
Steel got a deserved bad reputation when it first came out, but modern steel is quite good. I stick with #2's and #3's and they kill ducks very well. I agree 100%, about the loads and the gun. M & M has worked fine in mine for many years, and continues to. And for clays, the same gun won the AA Class S x S at the 2010 U S Open Sporting Clays Championship. SRH
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65 |
At some point I could have Briley's installed. Then I could dial it in for either bismuth or steel, and have options at the clay ranges. Really looking forward to taking ducks with it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 56 Likes: 37
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 56 Likes: 37 |
Really looking forward to taking ducks with it! I'm looking forward to seeing your pictures but don't stop at just ducks...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65 |
Makes me wonder why I waited so long.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 34
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 34 |
Bismuth hits a little harder than steel. So, there is at least one good reason. It hits a little harder but costs a lot more. If you only hunt ducks a couple times a year, its fine. But if you are out a couple times a week in a 108-day season, the cost adds up fast. I much prefer the old tungsten blends (tungsten-polymer, tungsten-iron, tungsten-steel, etc.), but I only use those on special hunts (e.g., 800 mile trips for two days of hunting). I have a decent supply of tungsten and bismuth, and the bismuth stays in the garage until I run out of the good stuff. My everyday load is #2 or 3 steel at 1450, works pretty well. The BSS will digest anything you run thru it. Old doubles are a different story.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,778 Likes: 443
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,778 Likes: 443 |
Just another muddy shotgun. It uses bismuth. I can live with the expense.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65 |
Brent, what is that and what made you select it for duck hunting?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,778 Likes: 443
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,778 Likes: 443 |
Dave, It's a special order Greener made in 1903. I like it because it is a very nice gun, fits me well, is fun to shoot. Has roughly an M/F set of chokes and kills ducks and pheasants very well.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,007 Likes: 65 |
Nice gun and a touch of class in the stinky muck.
|
|
|
|
|