S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,515
Posts562,248
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 |
Pete, Miller, Thanks. Yes, now I recall this chart. Yes, the "area under the curve" or total energy has to equate if the same velocity is achieved for same wt payloads. That 10" point on the chart is probably more or less close to a gas port on a gas gun. Looks like D. Oval is about 1500 psi higher than A. MX at the 4" point.
One thing I did find for myself, is that all promo loads don't necessarily have SAAMI max pressures. I tested several loads over two gauges and never got a max pressure or even within 10% of max. The pressure rig was verified with a known pressure load.
Last edited by Chuck H; 09/24/07 03:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598 |
ANSI/SAAMI Shotgun Pressure Specifications (Maximum Average Pressure in PSI) All Piezo measurements unless specified Cartridge Maximum Average pressure 10 gauge 11,000 (all) 12 gauge 11,5000 (all but 3 1/2" mag) 12 gauge 3 1/2" mag 14,000 16 gauge (11,500 (all) 20 Gauge 12,000 (all) 28 gauge 12,500 (all) .410 Bore 2 1/2" 12,500 .410 Bore 3" 13,500
Cartridge Class Shotshell Multiply Max Average Working pressure by Minimum Proof* 1.55 Maximum Proof** 1.70
* Min Proof values rounded UP to nearest 500 psi. ** Max Proof values rounded DOWN to nearest 500 psi.
Pete
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 532 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 532 Likes: 1 |
Pete,
Do you know the approximate date when DuPont ran these tests?
Rich
Rich
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598 |
Rich,
I really do not remember.
Miller do you recall when this was 1st published.
Pete
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 |
Just looking at the text below the table it seems to indicate the loadings were 3" 1 1/4 oz 7 1/2 shot. So, that would put it post 3" mag timeframe. '30s/40's? Seems like Miller had the reference originally.
Last edited by Chuck H; 09/25/07 02:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 937
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 937 |
Chuck,
I read that as 3 drams (or DE) NOT as 3,0 inch hull.
Niklas
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,883 Likes: 19 |
Good catch Niklas. Makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598 |
They name 3 DuPont powders: DuPont MX DuPont Bulk Shotgun smokeless DuPont Oval smokeless
So, when were all 3 on the shelf?
Pete
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,752
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,752 |
Friends:
The chart was originally published in the handbook published by DuPont "Smokeless Shotgun Powders - Their development, Composition and Ballistic Characteristics as They Effect the Action of Your Shotgun" by Wallace E. Coxe, 1933.
Tidbits: Ballistite manufacture was discontinued in 1922 ( see page 13). MX Smokeless was introduced in 1933 ( ibid) .
The illustrated curve ( page 20) is produced by pistons, with the results "... corrected by results obtained by the (piezo-electric gauge and cathode-ray ) oscillograph..."( page 20).
The text also notes various tests conducted on several powders, such tests being conducted in January , 1933.
Pete- DuPont Oval, MX, and Bulk were all on the shelf in 1933.
Hope this is of interest.
Regards
GKT
Last edited by Greg Tag; 09/25/07 07:13 PM.
Texas Declaration of Independence 1836 -The Indictment against the dictatorship, Para.16:"It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,598 |
Greg, A true well of knowledge. I have broken the link for the former graphic. I made an addition to the chart, so I will not forget the source.  Pete
|
|
|
|
|