Would I care to comment? Sure.
I have no problem with Trump checking with the military if there appears to be a coup underway perpetrated by widespread, organized cheating at the polls. No problem whatsoever. I also think the perps of said coup, if proven to have been attempted, should be tried on charges of treason.
And then the reverse is true isn't it? If there is no fraud and they attempt to use the military to overturn the election and the democratically implemented will of the people, I guess its treason for all those who support that action right CB?
Of course.
I hope you weren't thinking you had lured me into some ethical trap and it was a gotcha moment. LOL
Not for a moment CB, but what if we remove the variable of the military? In fact, I'm pretty sure that treason doesn't require the of the military.
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't your premise that its the election fraud that would result in the coup right?
So I just want to be sure, that if you agree the inverse is true as well, then a coup, just as well could be attempted, by attempting to stay in power by claiming fraud that never occurred. And that would be treason to right?
Do you agree with that CB?
