|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,939
Posts550,924
Members14,460
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,697 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,697 Likes: 97 |
This Grant was made in the early 70's. As far as the Baker single trigger, I have one in my 1907 Lang and it works flawlessly. I am just concerned about the small action and how it will handle 12 gauge loads. With a limited supply of light 3/4 ounce loads available I am just concerned about the gun shooting loose.
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,697 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,697 Likes: 97 |
In fact it actually is a pair of Grant 12/20's. Matched pair. With 27" barrels and single triggers. I can get the pair for a little under 15K. Just not sure about the small frame size. I suppose these were made up for driven grouse
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,990 Likes: 895
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,990 Likes: 895 |
What ammunition are you going to feed them that brings you such concern?
You’ve been here long enough to know these are not promotional ammunition guns. Unless you load it yourself, you will have a bit of an Easter egg hunt for ammunition. Big deal. Use your other guns when things are lean on the ammunition front. Buy a US made pump, and make sure you post a photo of all three of them, here, so jOe can add commentary. Having said that, I’d guess even if it were an issue, and you were forced to use high pressure promotional stuff, it would take you more life than you have left to wear out a pair of guns. That path might nick your gun conservator legacy, however.
That is a cute little first world problem to have. I am convinced you will manage, matched pair or not.
Good luck.
Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 779 Likes: 38
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 779 Likes: 38 |
This Grant was made in the early 70's. As far as the Baker single trigger, I have one in my 1907 Lang and it works flawlessly. I am just concerned about the small action and how it will handle 12 gauge loads. With a limited supply of light 3/4 ounce loads available I am just concerned about the gun shooting loose. Mike, I did not want to rain on your parade. Obviously I only see the ST mechanisms that have failed to function correctly and many, like your Lang, may work well. However, I would say that if considerable funds are involved, and you are unable to 'soak test' these guns before use, you should be resigned to the fact that IF they go wrong you may spend a long time chasing a solution to a problem that can only be sensibly resolved by converting them to double trigger. Just a friendly warning....!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 453 Likes: 61
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 453 Likes: 61 |
Judy had a single trigger Beretta 471 that began failing to reset for the second barrel or even sometimes fire the first barrel. Beretta in Accokeek and a good trigger man couldn't get it to function correctly. Unhappy wife.
Problem solved by sending the single trigger Beretta down the road and her buying a 16 gauge Ugartechea BLE and a 20 gauge Grulla SLE, both with double triggers which work perfectly. Happy wife.
We now have 7 double trigger SxS guns built from 1866 through 2009 (and had several more before we downsized to move last year) with nary a glitch from any of them.
For some reason single triggers in O/U guns seem to be much more reliable than in SxSs. I have two Beretta 687s and have never had an issue with either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 116 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 116 Likes: 3 |
So there seem to be two parallel discussions here: single triggers and strength of the 12/20 action. I do not have a strong the opinion on the ST issue although I would be somewhat reassured by the fact that these are relatively modern guns.
The 12/20 action is as strong or stronger than any conventional British SLE, indeed that is its beauty. Since it is a back action gun, the bar has no metal cut away for springs and is therefore solid metal. Furthermore, the action is cocked by a unique mechanism centered within the Purdey lugs that eliminates the need for cocking lugs to penetrate the bar, so again nothing but metal up front. All adding up to how a 12 bore can get by with a action body no wider than a conventional 20 bore. Hence its name: 12/20 or a 12 the width of a 20.
The issue is not action strength or resilience but rather recoil. Most of these guns weigh 6 lbs and a little change and therefore will really slap you if you shoot more than 1oz loads. I regularly shoot 7/8 oz comfortably but today shot a 100 clay round with 1oz loads at 1150fps without issue.
I believe I have seen the pair you are speaking of and they are beautiful guns. Truly London Bests…but light 27” 12 bores are not everyone’s cup of tea!
|
1 member likes this:
Toby Barclay |
|
|
|
|
|