mc. . a couple of years ago I would say absolutely that Reilly built it under a Scott patent action use number license. I might still say that but am wiser in the wiles of the gun trade and less dogmatic. If H&H used Scott Triplex actions, then others did too and it would have been logical financially for a gun maker to buy the action.
Still there is the "evidence." There are no Scott markings on the gun anywhere which is unusual if Scott built the action. Scott seems (according to legend) to have always found a way to add a number someplace. Reilly had the manufacturing infrastructure and workforce to do it. So, let's say "it is still under investigation."
Last edited by Argo44; 07/28/23 10:28 PM.
