I didn't say WHEN I was leaving keith, which would be foolish on a public forum in which I post by my identity. Have been waiting for Dave to OK your post. And I am otherwise occupied with things more important to me.

Thought you could get away with lying again keith? Please post a quote by me advocating eliminating lead ammunition
"the Preacher, the Nutty Professor, or LGF. They have made up their minds that lead ammunition is a real serious problem that needs to be severely restricted or eliminated entirely... and nobody with opposing views or facts is worthy of even stating them or pointing out obvious errors."

I guess you missed this (or lack the cojones to address it) so I'll try again with bigger letters. Read the part about "susceptability to lead poisoning" and the levels established as toxic

[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]

TO REPEAT MYSELF
1. Is it your position keith that there is no evidence that lead shot is a hazard for waterfowl? Eagles? Condors?
2. We all get that there is academic fraud, and fraud in the application of research. Please site a single study of lead toxicity in wildfowl that has been proved to have been falsified or retracted. You've got 60 years of research to review. I've looked and I'm sure Michael looked. And try to stay on topic.
3. Hating the political and agenda driven decisions needs to be separated from hating the science (and professional wildlife biologists), or we look like fools. I really do pity the fact that hate is all that you live on keith.

https://sites.google.com/a/damascusknowledge.com/www/home