Originally Posted by BrentD, Prof
Originally Posted by eightbore
I disagree that the added locking points have anything to do with necessity and that added locking points were added because one locking point was not sufficient. Many examples of single locking points that are sufficient have been shown.

If they are unnecessary, and clearly not cheap to produce, why are they there?

Literally millions of shotguns are safe and secure, and have digested billions of shells with single locking bolt systems. That should be enough for anyone capable of rational thought. Multiple locking bolts on shotguns are there because, as P.T. Barnum famously observed...

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

P.T. Barnum is long gone, but he has been replaced by other Hucksters and Show Men...

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.