AI learns by ingesting massive amounts of data to guide its decisions. If that input is flawed the output will be too. What we're talking about here is mainly text-based outcomes to questions based on text-based inputs. This is different than machine learning which uses data (numeric) to guide its outputs (best example of machine learning you run into each day is pricing, which is derived by algorithm to raise the prices you're not paying attention and be competitive on the ones you notice.)
So Gene is right that this generation (you old farts) know more about what's really true than a lot of what's been written, and you could help capture the truth now -- in fact you are when you share what you actually know on posts here on this site.
I don't know how much that's negatively impacted by the Keiths of the world who vomit random politic views on various threads. My hope is AI is sophisticated enough to filter out that BS from the real questions at hand (double guns and their care and feeding.) But who knows?
Keith constantly warns us of the dangers inherent to the left. You belittle his efforts but I'd like to ask you, what good will AI be to you when your guns have been deemed illegal, and they come to get them? Will AI console you? Maybe you feel you don't need the warnings Keith offers, but I see where they hurt nothing and could help immensely.
