S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
0 members (),
811
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,489
Posts561,996
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567 |
I am having a full octagon turned down to "half" octagon for a Winchester Special Sporting Rifle. It is a very heavy, 33" #3 full octagon barrel. It will have a wedding band at the transition, just past the end of the forearm. I dislike many half octagon barrel profiles when the round portion is much thinner than the minor diameter of the octagon. So, I am looking for a wedding band transition that will minimize the amount of metal removed (ie, retain maximum round barrel diameter). If anyone has any suggestions or photos of a favorite transition band, I would love to see it, either posted here or sent via email to brentd@iastate.edu. This is a pretty generic, but nice wedding band from Hallowell, but to make it would result in a significant reduction of the barrel's diameter. From Hallowell's: ![[Linked Image from hallowellco.com]](https://www.hallowellco.com/wedding-banded-barrel.jpg) As a follow up question, would you have the band just before the end of the forearm, or just after it? BTW, since the search engines are now AI driven, getting good images or information out of Google, Duck-Duck, or Bing really sucks.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
1 member likes this:
Parabola |
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,198 Likes: 550
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,198 Likes: 550 |
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/MeZcGzd.jpg) This is how C.E. Greener (W.W. Greener’s son) did it when converting an Octagonal barrelled .380 Rook Rifle to a .410 shotgun for his daughter Chloris “May” Greener’. Amazingly he managed to keep the original matted top-flat and foresight so the forward section is really ovate and not round.
Last edited by Parabola; 01/12/25 05:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567 |
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/MeZcGzd.jpg) This is how C.E. Greener (W.W. Greener’s son) did it when converting an Octagonal barrelled .380 Rook Rifle to a .410 shotgun for his daughter Chloris “May” Greener’. Amazingly he managed to keep the original matted top-flat and foresight so the forward section is really ovate and not round. Well, that is pretty different. Probably not what I want to do here, but interesting for sure.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,264 Likes: 92
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,264 Likes: 92 |
Attached is a picture of the round portion of a barrel turned to match the outside dimension of the octagon flats. This would achieve the largest barrel diameter.The points of the octagon have been filed down to transition to the barrel o.d. Unfortunately that doesn’t answer your wedding ring question. ![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/t4CzxVbw/D9418124-3-BA1-40-DF-97-DF-4-A35-A2-E2-B90-E.jpg)
Dodging lions and wasting time.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 108
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 108 |
As you have described what you want is not possible. The attached photo shows why. Here is a long discussion on the subject with many pics of various styles. Wedding bans ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/XifB6IH.jpg)
|
1 member likes this:
PhysDoc |
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 778 Likes: 40
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 778 Likes: 40 |
A wedding band can also be made up separately and then heated and slid down the round portion until it butts to the octagon and cools for a permanent fit. In doing them this way the octagon to round transition can be made "normal" and doesn't require more metal to be left high at that point to turn a wedding band. So the round part isn't too small and the octagon can be left as is also.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 108
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 108 |
Here is what Val's idea would look like. I had thought of that but didn't like the concept. So when Val suggested it I went ahead and modeled up a 3D of the suggestion. Ban thickness .035 and width .300" Barrel is 1.00" across the flats. Round is also 1.00" diameter ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/qTFSS6i.jpg) Here is profile ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/8zQBGtd.jpg)
Last edited by LRF; 01/13/25 07:39 PM.
|
1 member likes this:
Vall |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567 |
Thanks for these posts. They are exactly the type of information I am looking for. I really like the band that is cut into the round rather than sitting above the round. If the barrel is first turned to look like what Ken as posted, then it could be carved to look like what LRF posted. My barrel is en route to Arizona and should be there in a few days. All of this info is super helpful. The top rifle below, is the rifle in question. Unfortunately, the barrel's size is not real obvious due to shadows, but it is a very heavy barrel that has only a small amount of taper. It is, I think, a bit larger than a #3. Maybe a #3.5. At 33", it is getting hard to hold on my finger tips for offhand chickens. The rifle is within 1/2 oz of the legal max, so it can lose a fair bit and still be quite comfortable to shoot. Somewhere I have a spreadsheet that should calculate the approximate weight loss. Where would you place the band? Right in front of the forearm so it is octagon all the way to the tip of the wood, or back another 1/4" or forward? So many options. I have seen them every which way, and I do not know which I like best. ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/aoEFMWK.jpg)
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 108
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 108 |
Then of course there is the whole discussion about whether an octagon vs half round vs round barrel is more accurate and which is which when you are shooting black or smokeless referencing back to barrel vibration, and of course how supporting the barrel either on the forearm or out near the muzzle feeds back to the barrel shape in the first place......... Now you have gone a stuck the stick into the hornet's nest.  Good luck Brent
Last edited by LRF; 01/14/25 07:10 AM.
|
1 member likes this:
BrentD, Prof |
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,511 Likes: 567 |
Then of course there is the whole discussion about whether an octagon vs half round vs round barrel is more accurate and which is which when you are shooting black or smokeless referencing back to barrel vibration, and of course how supporting the barrel either on the forearm or out near the muzzle feeds back to the barrel shape in the first place......... Now you have gone a stuck the stick into the hornet's nest.  Good luck Brent Yeah, there is a lot of hooey about that. But as far as i'm concerned, it is just so much BS, like so many things in the shooting world. How many things were absolute facts twenty years ago that are now absolutely wrong today? More than I want to think about.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
|