Originally Posted by Drew Hause
Maj. Sir Gerald Burrard, The Modern Shotgun, 1955, Vol. II, “The Cartridge”, Appendix VI, p. 284
Webley Pendulum Gun. Taper from cone to barrel bore .735” to .733” over 12”; .733” bore to choke .690”
Pressure converted using Burrard’s estimated Long Tons/ Sq. Inch Lead Crusher Pressure (Cp) to PSI (pound-force per square inch):
(Cp x 1.5) - .5 = TSI, TSI X 2240 = PSI.

…………………..............……………………………….…1 inch………6 inches….%
“E.C.” No. 3 3 Dr.Eq. 1 1/16 oz. shot…………...7,750……….3,786……49
“Schultze” 3 Dr.Eq. 1 1/16 oz. shot…….…….….6,842……….4,323……63
Smokeless Diamond 3 Dr.Eq. 1 1/16 oz.shot….8,758……….3,685……42
Smokeless Diamond 3 Dr.Eq. 1 oz. shot……..….8,355……….4,021……48
Sporting Ballistite 3 Dr.Eq. 1 1/16 oz. shot…..9,901……….4,088….…41

Preacher, in this shotgun barrel pressure data for long obsolete powders, we see two 3 Dram Equiv. loads for Smokeless Diamond powder.

It seems odd that there is claimed to be a greater pressure drop at 6" for the heavier 1 1/16 oz. shot load than the lighter 1 oz. load with the same powder charge. Did you notice that, and do you have an explanation? The disparity seems to be greater than a normal Standard Deviation for equal loads, let alone equal powder loads with different shot weights.


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug