S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
3 members (CJF, Karl Graebner, 1 invisible),
490
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,489
Posts562,002
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,198 Likes: 550
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,198 Likes: 550 |
Welcome to the Forum Johann!
The London view mark and the wording “New Barrels fitted by..” suggests that Adkins was not the original maker, but that it came from a London gunmaker and that the barrels needed replacing.
Perhaps other Forum makers will be able to recognise the likely original maker.
There is sometimes a lock makers name stamped on the inside of the lockplates, but specialist lock makers like Brazier, Chilton and Stanton made locks for many different gunmakers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,543 Likes: 102
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,543 Likes: 102 |
It was re-barreled in Birmingham in 1953 .J Ross 1890 patent 19395 ejector work .The 574 could be the number of the ejector made under that patent .
As the action is unsigned I would assume that it was a gun made to be sold out to the provincial trade and engraved up as the seller.At the time of manufacture there were little or no requirements for record keeping or gun serial numbers .As a note to this I have had similar guns to which I have made and marked guns with an ID number to meet current UK law .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 833 Likes: 32
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 833 Likes: 32 |
Could not open the photos. I have a Henry Adkin, SLE, 12 30” Damascus barrels, with Adkin’s name on the locks and name-address on the rib. It has SN 182, stamped on the underside barrel rib, and of course both BP and NP BIrmingham marks for 2&1/2” It is lively, handles like dream, was little used, with original case color, clean bores, and barrel brown. My understanding of Adkin is that they were a provincial maker and manufactured around 2000 guns, SL and BL. Whoever ordered this must have wanted above average wood because the stock is honey colored and smokey with distinct mineral lines. Weighs 6 Lbs 5 oz.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,306 Likes: 613
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,306 Likes: 613 |
I have a 16 bore Adkin hammergun with great wood as well.
Firearms imports, consignments
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,344 Likes: 648
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,344 Likes: 648 |
It was re-barreled in Birmingham in 1953 .J Ross 1890 patent 19395 ejector work .The 574 could be the number of the ejector made under that patent .
As the action is unsigned I would assume that it was a gun made to be sold out to the provincial trade and engraved up as the seller.At the time of manufacture there were little or no requirements for record keeping or gun serial numbers .As a note to this I have had similar guns to which I have made and marked guns with an ID number to meet current UK law . Here’s a thread on Ross Patent ejectors. Having worked on a gun fitted with this system, where the ejectors weren’t working correctly ….I don’t think I’d buy another gun that is fitted with this system. I did finally get the ejectors working right, but it was a tough job! https://doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=638004
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,535 Likes: 451
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,535 Likes: 451 |
Last edited by Argo44; 09/02/25 12:35 PM.
Baluch are not Brahui, Brahui are Baluch
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 9 Likes: 1
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 9 Likes: 1 |
Thank you for your reply - I had an assumption that this was the case. However I am now on the bottom as regards to the origins of my shotgun 😅
Niels Johann Holm Jacobsen
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 9 Likes: 1
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 9 Likes: 1 |
Niels Johann Holm Jacobsen
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 9 Likes: 1
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 9 Likes: 1 |
It was re-barreled in Birmingham in 1953 .J Ross 1890 patent 19395 ejector work .The 574 could be the number of the ejector made under that patent .
As the action is unsigned I would assume that it was a gun made to be sold out to the provincial trade and engraved up as the seller.At the time of manufacture there were little or no requirements for record keeping or gun serial numbers .As a note to this I have had similar guns to which I have made and marked guns with an ID number to meet current UK law . Here’s a thread on Ross Patent ejectors. Having worked on a gun fitted with this system, where the ejectors weren’t working correctly ….I don’t think I’d buy another gun that is fitted with this system. I did finally get the ejectors working right, but it was a tough job! https://doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=638004Thank you for your reply! What issues did you meet with this system? Ill run it by my gunsmith and try and prepare him.
Niels Johann Holm Jacobsen
|
|
|
|
|