S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
4 members (SKB, NCTarheel, j7l2, 1 invisible),
437
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,488
Posts561,982
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377 |
Um, I have migrated on to VV N 165 in my 5,6X61R trek and have worked up from 41.5 grains to 45 grains of VV N 165 which nets an average velocity of right @ 3100 ft/s. You can run all these programs in the fantasy / pushbutton world, which does indeed make it a bit simplier, but empirical data is where I have firm footing.... Once you break the 3000 ft/s threshold, with whatever propellant you chose, this cartridge just seem to perform the same: hitting in the same spot, albeit w/ iron sights. ] ![[Linked Image from thumbs2.imgbox.com]](https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/57/5a/nkULIHVW_t.jpg) Above is a Date Syrup Can that I use specifically for the final shot of a series. Now all these holes are from the same bullet weight but different propellants & different loads. On my last shot w/ 45 grains of VV N 165 I hit in the same hole as a previous load(I have a foto of the reverse side if there are any Doubting Thomas' out there......). I have shot the cartridge enough that when you break the 3000 ft/s - 3100 ft/s threshold, I can just tell by the recoil where we are. Can the new fangled bullet/powder program discern that? I think by the time I approach 3200 ft/s - 3300 ft/s, VV N 165 is going to nicely fill the case. This maybe a necessity and possibly warrant a Magnum Primer, but I haven't gotten to that point just yet. My hopes are to see similar success w/ VV N 170. But to press the envelope forward this, I will need Glass atop the gun & they will take some time. Hochachtungsvoll,, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377 |
As a sidenote, most of the time, the 79/80 grain bullet passes thru the Date Syrup Can & it never stirs.... Pretty much the same w/ the smaller evaporated milk can.
Hochachtungsvoll,,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377 |
I believe I have come to the terminal segment w/ VV N 165 using 3 grams on the nose for the 5,6X61R vom Hofe Super Express @ 3270 ft/s, with the standard deviation being surprisingly small for a handful of shots w/ a 79/80 grain Northern Precision Bonded Hollow Point. The powder fills the case nicely and keeps the velocity variation low, which seems to be a necessity for this cartridge. In the near future I will give VV N 170 a try....
Hochachtungsvoll,,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,935 Likes: 340
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,935 Likes: 340 |
Raimey, One thing empirical data does not give you until too late is a good estimate of chamber pressure. The "stringing" of the shots on the syrup can is typical of "stringing" caused by the rifle barrel heating up while the shot barrel does not. If you are shooting for a group, you only need to wait longer between shots. If you are hunting, the animal will be dead or gone before the barrel heats up anyway, so it won't be a problem. Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377 |
So Ford are you saying the program can measure my chamber pressure?? How does it measure my chamber volume? Pretty neat device for remote sensing??? That >>Stringing<< is me pulling to the left trying not to shoot the Sun-Shade off the Chrony. There are days if not weeks between all those shots. I wait between shots to let the barrel cool.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 118 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 118 Likes: 13 |
So Ford are you saying the program can measure my chamber pressure?? No. It is a (very good) program, and a program measures not. It extrapolates. Rather good and rather reliably.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,935 Likes: 340
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,935 Likes: 340 |
Raimey, The program will take the data you input, including either actual case capacity or recorded capacity of standard case, bullet specs. barrel length, Pressure limitations, etc. and give you estimated velocity and charge weight of a specific powder or powders or all available powders. Or, if you input the specs and proposed charge weight of a specific powder, it will estimate the highest pressure and velocity. Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377 |
Oh, so it is an estimation or assumption, if you will. Remember, Assumption is the Antithesis of Exactitude.....
Hochachtungsvoll,,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,076 Likes: 377 |
So Ford what pressure did you get your chamber up to & what ballistics program did you use?
Hochachtungsvoll,,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,935 Likes: 340
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,935 Likes: 340 |
Raimey, That was 20+ years ago and I didn't have access to a ballistics program. I had to trust predecessor's advice and guidance as well as the chronograph and targets. It is neither an estimation nor assumption, it is a calculation based the results of many previous scientific studies/tests. Mike
|
1 member likes this:
Carcano |
|
|
|
|