|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 members (MattH, SKB),
621
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,669
Posts563,972
Members14,605
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,962 Likes: 350
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,962 Likes: 350 |
Does the rifle regulate with BP Express or Nitro Express ammo? Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
![[Linked Image from thumbs2.imgbox.com]](https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/f6/e1/02lpXKgM_t.jpg) I would say these stamps are truly coupled as the Belgians like the Germans were most methodical in their procedures and application. The Calibrator applied the stamps, as well as cobbled together the proof load or approved the proof cartridge, and this was his job. He/she was a very proud lot & took their task quite seriously. Although the font is indeed different, I again say the Calibrator applied the encircled marks in one effort & then the Inspector applied his mark. Serbus, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
So to answer your Powder type question, the tubes in a singular state, experienced proof w/ a Blackpowder load prescribed by the Calibrator and then when joined the tubeset experienced Semi-Smokeless proof as prescribed by the Calibrator, who early on required 0.6mm windage between the difference of the diameter of the projectile and the diameter of the tube.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
But the Question that begs, is what exactly does the letters >>PV<< under a Rampant Lion denote. When 1st pressed into service, the stamp meant Voluntary Proof of Semi-Smokeless for a Military Callibre. Therefore, and I acknowledge of French, could it stand for Proof Voluntary / Volunteer ???
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
Ah, I finally found it: >>Poudre Vive<<, an early moniker for Semi-Smokeless Nitro Powders. So yes, still in the language of French.
With the advent of the optional >>Poudre Vive<<, then is is most likely that such a platform experienced up to 5 Proof Efforts, with the last couple being Optional.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,802 Likes: 479
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,802 Likes: 479 |
Not semi-smokeless Raimey At the beginning of the optional PV in 1891 the specific bulk smokeless with which the gun was proved was specified; "E.C.", "Schultze", and later Mullerite, "New Schultze" and "E.C. No. 2 & 3" Smokeless “Schultze” was offered by Von Lengerke & Detmold in the U.S. in 1887 The American “E.C.” & “Schultze” Powder Company was established in Oakland, New Jersey by Capt. Money in 1890. ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-kcLvhf7/0/KgHC69s7k9CW5H5PMzvNfg6x8JqRbtR24qrzhTzQx/M/belgian%20xkcmvn-M.jpg) I've seen guns later than 1898 still indicating the powder "E.C. No. 3" with the stylized lion “New E.C. (Improved) No. 3” was introduced in U.S. in 1904; likely earlier in Europe and England ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-D7RGGgT/0/LpJbqgXHwCPpdbQJPQ8GRZg6WjNLMCK2BJ4hbxKwT/M/EC%20No.%203%20Proof-M.jpg) Mullerite proved ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-BgxZd8W/0/NfhsZTZpNbTFc3r5nP5sctFmWwPLfwD8nbzRT44Lr/M/Mullerite%20proved-M.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
I still contend the phrase >>Semi-Smokeless<< at its core applies as it revolved around >>Wood Powder<< and was indeed the Sch & EC you note. The proof was purely optional & had to be submitted in writing by the maker.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,802 Likes: 479
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,802 Likes: 479 |
Maybe by the hard-headed Germans  but not by the Belgians nor the clueless Americans American Wood Powder was an improved version of Dittmer powder, the first “Nitro” (semi-smokeless [according to the British] nitrated wood cellulose) powder produced in the U.S. (not likely ever offered in Europe to compete with "Schultze") and was introduced about 1883. It was marketed by Von Lengerke & Detmold. It was replaced by King’s Powder Co., Cincinnati “King’s Smokeless” in 1895. Scientific American Supplement, October 4, 1890 “Smokeless Powder” https://books.google.com/books?id=6d45AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA12308 Wetterven, Walsrode, Maxim, Nobel, and Vieille all mentioned 1893 S.S. (Sporting Shotgun) didn't last long as it developed high pressures with small gauge shells ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Shotshells-and-pressures/Shotshells/i-QqRT94B/0/NC4L9JZQTbjsdvwktHg943f9TTL3BZVWvKrGv2Dzv/L/UMC%201893-L.png)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
You penned it Exactly.
The only reason the Belgians were updating their proof rules & powders was an attempt to keep in pace w/ the Germans as the Belgians were supplying ALL the Rough Bored Tubes for the German platforms. The Germans also had a Semi-Smokeless Voluntary Proof and if the Belgians adopted the same process and powder, how could it not be Semi-Smokless? It wasn't till 1911/1912 for the Germans to migrate to a True Nitro stamp and the Belgians may have gotten wind and started their efforts in 1910???
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,182 Likes: 434 |
Yet another interesting Belgian Decree of November 18th, 1903 established the use of the >>Unique<< >>standardized smokeless powder<< as the Official Smokeless Powder, instead of the 25 powder variations, and was deemed the 4th Proof as an Optional Proof and the Calibrator applied the stamp of the Rampant Lion over PV(>>Poudre Vive<<). Then if a maker wanted a specific proof from the lot of 25 approved and available powders, the platform was subjected to a 5th Proof Effort, purely optional or voluntary of course.
Serbus,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|