|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,706
Posts564,424
Members14,611
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,267 Likes: 602
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,267 Likes: 602 |
“Inexpensive” and “.410”combined in the same phrase seem to be a grammatical impossibility, even on this side of the pond where a lead ban in 3 years and a lack of viable non toxic .410 loads should logically be depressing values.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Bob Cash
|
12/20/25 09:05 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
ClapperZapper
|
12/20/25 09:18 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Parabola
|
12/20/25 11:45 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
eightbore
|
12/21/25 12:00 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
ClapperZapper
|
12/21/25 12:50 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Daryl Hallquist
|
12/20/25 11:57 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
canvasback
|
12/21/25 01:03 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
12/21/25 02:03 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
12/21/25 03:49 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
12/21/25 04:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|