|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (R. Glenz),
512
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,839
Posts566,361
Members14,623
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 669 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 669 Likes: 13 |
Federal and Herters each sell 3-1/4x1-1/4x 1220fps shotshells an old standby. What is the psi rating for these?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,005 Likes: 1566
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,005 Likes: 1566 |
Federal and Herters each sell 3-1/4x1-1/4x 1220fps shotshells an old standby. What is the psi rating for these? Below SAAMI max. Best, Ted
|
|
2 members like this:
keith, Stanton Hillis |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,239 Likes: 2013
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,239 Likes: 2013 |
Federal and Herters each sell 3-1/4x1-1/4x 1220fps shotshells an old standby. What is the psi rating for these? The only way to know is to send samples for pressure testing and pay the toll. And, after you get the results you will only know what the pressure was for that particular lot. Next lot may, or may not, be different.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
2 members like this:
keith, Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,858 Likes: 504
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,858 Likes: 504 |
As said, only the makers know, and they aren't sharing  I've never seen independent testing for the 1 1/4 3 1/4 loads For a historical perspective, from “Smokeless Shotgun Powders: Their Development, Composition and Ballistic Characteristics” by Wallace H Coxe; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 1933, for a 3 Dr. Eq. 1 1/4 oz. load. Pressure by modern piezo transducers would be 10-14% higher.DuPont Bulk = 9,600 psi FFFg = 9,000 psi DuPont Oval = 8,700 psi DuPont MX = 9,800 psi DuPont MX Smokeless was a Dense Multi Base Powder introduced about 1928. 25.5 grains was 3 Dram Eq. and it was promoted as a 1 1/4 oz. Trap load. It was replaced in the 1954 with IMR PB. IMHO it is safe to assume a modern 3 1/4 Dr.Eq. load pressure would NOT be any less.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,899 Likes: 748
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,899 Likes: 748 |
The replies from Ted and Stan were the only ones that came even close to answering the OP's question.
Specialty ammo loaded to lower pressures seems to almost always be more expensive than standard SAAMI spec ammo. So it would seem to benefit ammo makers financially to disclose pressure data for each lot they produce. Archaic terms such as Dram Equivalent mean little to the average shooter. There is no question they test their ammo and have that data. There is no question that they do more testing anytime they change powder, primers, or other components, just out of product liability concerns.
Or maybe they don't give us a thought, since the segment of the market that wants lower pressure ammo isn't large enough to get their attention. And maybe that situation could change if enough of us requested it from the source... instead of asking people who just don't know.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,858 Likes: 504
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,858 Likes: 504 |
I looked through an Alliant reloading manual for that load, and with 20/28, Unique, Herco & Blue Dot the pressures ranged 9000 - about 10,000 psi. IMHO it is very unlikely that non-specialty loads (or B&P) would be LESS than 9000 psi.
Was not aware that the Herter's tradename is now owned by Bass Pro-Cabelas and the shotshells are by Winchester; which of course may change as can components & powder
Some time ago I contacted Remington, Winchester & Federal regarding 16g pressures and no one responded. The only way to have factory loads tested today is by Tom Armbrust.
re: SAAMI recommended standards, but NOT carrying the force of law like CIP standards. SAAMI allows the maximum average pressure for 12 gauge 2 3/4” and 3” shotgun shells to be 11,500 psi +/- 900 psi, with the maximum extreme variability not to exceed an uber-max of 12,500 psi +/- 900 psi or 13,400 psi. CIP 12g 2 3/4" Maximum Statistical Individual Pressure is 850 BAR = 12,328 psi
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,005 Likes: 1566
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,005 Likes: 1566 |
Keith, I’m guessing that the manufacturers of shotgun ammunition know, exactly, what pressure is produced from every single loading they produce. They know exactly which components affect that level of pressure, and why. I’d bet there is far more testing of loaded ammunition than we would have guessed.
That said, there is exactly zero evidence to suggest that sharing that information with the end user would be a benefit to them. Leaving the answer to the question at “below SAAMI max” puts any and all responsibilities for the use of that ammunition on whoever bought it. They tell you straight up it could be the hottest stuff that they can get away with loading, and it is totally up to the consumer to make sure his equipment is up to it. They will be no “he said” in a courtroom when somebody guesses wrong on what they can get away with on their antique gun.
If somebody has a requirement for low pressure ammunition, they had better be sure they source low pressure ammunition for that requirement. I am stunned at the guys who are willing to take a guess that some off the shelf ammunition will be what they need for their old gun. Guys who I figure should know better, do it right here, all the time.
Best, Ted
|
|
2 members like this:
canvasback, Stanton Hillis |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,521 Likes: 383
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,521 Likes: 383 |
OK, Ted, does this mean my flats of “low brass” might be suspect ?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,005 Likes: 1566
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,005 Likes: 1566 |
OK, Ted, does this mean my flats of “low brass” might be suspect ? Well, yea. I don’t test ammunition, but, in casual conversation with a few production people employed at Federal Cartridge, right up the road from me, promotional ammunition is the most inconsistent and features some of the highest pressures. How inconsistent, and how high pressure, is known by a lot fewer people than you would think. Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|