|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,924
Posts567,784
Members14,633
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 527 Likes: 55
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 527 Likes: 55 |
At the Federal level there are some pro-gun Democrats, mostly in some of the Southern states and along the border with Canada. Former Montana Senator Jon Tester (D) was pro gun.
At the state level there are Democrats that are pro gun. Connecticut has some, enough to prevent some of the more drastic bills from being passed.
There are people out there, Democrat, Republican and Independent who are nominally pro gun, but that's not their priority during an election. There are also those out there willing to accept restrictions on fire arms, they don't own, will never own and don't like.
And arguing on an internet forum isn't going to change anyone's mind.
If you don't agree with them, ignore or hide them and don't do business with them. Yup. To the point about arguing on the internet: That's why it's so funny/pointless to see the same people yelling past each other all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,748 Likes: 364
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,748 Likes: 364 |
…..Former Montana Senator Jon Tester (D) was pro gun…. It doesn’t have to be an internet argument to simply fact check. This Senator voted approximately 95% party line. There might be a far bigger America beyond 2A issues. But, there is a hypocrisy, apathy that is part of the wider community. Good thing this isn’t an EV or mental health forum.
|
|
1 member likes this:
keith |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 527 Likes: 55
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 527 Likes: 55 |
[quote=Chantry]Good thing this isn’t an EV or mental health forum. It's certainly not the latter. 🤣
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,952 Likes: 790
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,952 Likes: 790 |
FWIW, I know bunches of Democrats who are staunch 2A supporters, and even more independents who are. I saw this statement when it was first posted on pg.1 of this Thread. The only possible way it could be true if if these "bunches of Democrats, and even more Independents" did not vote or support politicians who have an anti-2nd Amendment voting record. If any of them voted for or supported Biden, Obama, the Clintons, Al Gore, and legions of other politicians, mostly Democrat, with undeniable anti-gun records, then there is no way they are staunch 2A supporters. (Note: I never voted for my Republican Senator Pat Toomey after he sided with Obama on Gun Control... we have free will.) I resisted the urge to immediately comment, and decided to wait a bit to see what others had to say. I was sure there would be others who also saw the ridiculousness of it. I was also sure the usual suspects would applaud it. The thought that anyone who merely owns or shoots guns is a "staunch 2A supporter" is a false and dishonest notion advanced by those who support the insane "Big Tent" theory that says gun owners as a whole are stronger if we all stick together. Unfortunately, voting for those who continually infringe upon Gun Rights is not sticking together. That is undermining and back-stabbing those who actually are working and voting to maintain and secure our 2nd Amendment Rights. The only reason they continue to enjoy Gun Rights is because of the votes and efforts of those who do understand that supporting anti-gunners is counterproductive. And stupid. Let me try to simplify this so that even a mentally retarded person might understand... Nobody in their right mind would say that someone who donates to or supports a politician who favors late term abortion is a staunch pro-life supporter. Nobody in their right mind would say that a Pentagon employee who gives classified military secrets to the Chinese is a staunch U.S. patriot. Nobody in their right mind would say a Cop who breaks into a house and takes personal property without a Warrant is a staunch 4th Amendment Supporter. Nobody in their right mind would say that a dictator who shuts down Free Speech, Newspapers, and Religion is a staunch supporter of 1st Amendment principles. 92 years have passed since the National Firearms Act of 1934. For 92 years, there has been a sustained effort by mostly one Party to infringe upon or eliminate Gun Rights. The only possible excuse for any gun owner with even a room temperature I.Q. to say this ain't so is if they have their heads up their ass. As the late Charlie Kirk would say, "Prove me wrong."
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,952 Likes: 790
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,952 Likes: 790 |
At the Federal level there are some pro-gun Democrats, mostly in some of the Southern states and along the border with Canada. Former Montana Senator Jon Tester (D) was pro gun.
At the state level there are Democrats that are pro gun. Connecticut has some, enough to prevent some of the more drastic bills from being passed.
There are people out there, Democrat, Republican and Independent who are nominally pro gun, but that's not their priority during an election. There are also those out there willing to accept restrictions on fire arms, they don't own, will never own and don't like.
And arguing on an internet forum isn't going to change anyone's mind.
If you don't agree with them, ignore or hide them and don't do business with them. Yup. To the point about arguing on the internet: That's why it's so funny/pointless to see the same people yelling past each other all the time. Yet here you are Geoff. Eleven triggered Posts on just this one Thread. Eleven and counting. The most prolific voice by far, yelling about something that has zero to do with the subject of the Thread. But I keep forgetting that only certain "special" people have the right to voice an opinion. Funny how that works.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 527 Likes: 55
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 527 Likes: 55 |
FedEx is suing the Federal government for $1 billion to recover costs of tariffs.
The first of many?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,952 Likes: 790
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,952 Likes: 790 |
Tim, there is an inconsistency there that they are not seeing, or admitting. IMO, some people have voted Democratic for so long that it's like they are stuck in a rut that they are unwilling to remove themselves from. They are so used to defending the Democratic platforms, they can't imagine doing anything else.
The Democratic party is not what it was in our grandparents' day. It has devolved to the extent that it is unrecognizable to some of us, but yet some remain staunchly loyal to it. I liken it to a mother who continues to love AND SUPPORT her child who has gone "AWOL" and now lives in a way totally alien to how it was raised.
But, loving what used to be is a terrible excuse for owning up to the reality that your child has gone bad, and it needs to be accepted as the bad seed it has become. The Democratic party has devolved into a bad seed. What it's "parents" have done is make excuses for it, to the point that it is now ridiculous to the sane.
Patriots can only hope and pray that, given enough rope, it will hang itself. Stan, your Post makes a strong case for Poll Testing. Any U.S. citizen over age 18 has the RIGHT to vote. They can vote however they wish, even write-in Mickey Mouse on their ballot. But it's utterly ignorant and irresponsible to vote for any candidate without knowing their positions and past voting record. Sadly, many people including many gun owners, simply vote Straight Ticket Democrat in spite of how far left the Party has gone. Others, including several here, know exactly what the Democrat Party now stands for, and still support it. We can only conclude they place greater importance on things like gay and transgender rights, continuation of unfair Trade Policies, men in women's sports, higher taxes, elimination of fossil fuels, unfettered illegal immigration, Open Borders, Trillions of dollars of waste-fraud- and abuse, a massive Welfare State, a catch-and-release legal system (except for political enemies), etc. It took my staunch Democrat parents a while to finally see this was not the same Democrat Party they once supported. But at least they had the brains to walk away when it no longer represented their interests. As a gun owner, my Dad was first to see there were no longer representing him or our founding principles, and also constantly attacking his Constitutional Gun Rights, but my mother soon followed. So it is just another big fat lie to say nobody ever changes their mind. See the successes of the WalkAway Movement, DemExit, TurningPointUSA, and other organized efforts that are successfully showing millions of blacks, latinos, christians, women, etc. that the Democrats are hurting them and our nation. Unfortunately, the "bad seed" Democrat Party will continue to have substantial support and a lot of clout so long as they have a large voter base dependent upon Welfare benefits. They are beginning to see they alienated a significant part of the electorate, so they are pretending to modify their positions to get back in power. What we can do about it is to strongly push our elected Reps to enact strong Voter I.D. Laws, restrict most all mail-in-voting and unattended ballot drop boxes, and enhance security of voting machines and ballot counting. Democrat opposition to election security shows they need cheating to win. And as gun owners, we should stop accepting the silly idea that fellow gun owners who support anti-gunners are "staunch 2nd Amendment supporters". They aren't.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 770
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 770 |
FedEx is suing the Federal government for $1 billion to recover costs of tariffs.
The first of many? It will be interesting, the Feds did illegally tax me for many thousands of dollars, I sure would like my money back. My clients feel the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 193 Likes: 268
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 193 Likes: 268 |
FWIW, I know bunches of Democrats who are staunch 2A supporters, and even more independents who are.
The independents I get, but how do Democrats staunchly support the Second Amendment? When the representative they elected votes in favor of gun control legislation, do they file petitions to have that representative recalled? When the ATF enacts restrictive new rules on firearms, or an anti-gun leftist is nominated to the Supreme Court, do they call for the presidents impeachment? Do they vote for Trump, because they know Harris and Clinton have no respect for the second amendment? I'm missing something here.
In the end, the only thing that matters, is who you send to Washington or your state capitol, everything else is blowing smoke. You can beat your chest and shout your support through a megaphone, but you're only fooling yourself and other like-minded Democrats. You might as well be marching in a parade led by a bunch of Muslim malcontents, carrying a banner proclaiming "Jews for Palestine" or "gays for Palestine". I suspect that you(?) and all the other 2A Democrats will continue on in this charade, as long as enough Republicans keep getting sent to Washington to insulate you from the consequences of your poor decisions. I am not a Democrat. ...as for how 2A Democrats and independents support 2A...neither you, nor I get to decide what they are doing is wrong if it doesn't align with what we are doing and/or believe. No one is just one thing, and almost nothing is binary, despite attempts by politicians, media and others to describe it thus. Well, that is a wonderfully progressive/liberal thing to say. "Everything is just points on a spectrum" "Speak your truth" "Break the binary" But actually, there is a lot of binary out there, and it all breaks down into right or wrong. Despite attempts by intellectuals and their weak-minded followers who want to see this country turned upside down. And, we do get to decide what's wrong, it's called results. Take for example, the senator your pro-gun democrat buddies sent to Washington, Tammy Baldwin. Do you know what her voting record on the Second Amendment is? I'll give you a hint, it's not good, at all. If your idea of defending the Second Amendment is sending a gun hating Senator to Washington, you're wrong, it's really just that simple. But you still haven't answered my question. How do you staunchly defend the Second Amendment when you send staunchly anti-gun congressmen and Senators to Washington? How do you see it as a win, when the people you elect are actively trying to legislate the Second Amendment out of existence? I'm trying to understand this, explain it, if you will. Tim
who you've been ain't who you've got to be
|
|
3 members like this:
dirty harry, Stanton Hillis, keith |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 770
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 770 |
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/qpMFegel.jpg) Shame it seems to be so hard for to understand Tim.
|
|
|
|
|