|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 members (long range, ouchessie, Carcano, earlyriser, Marks_21, 1 invisible),
1,078
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,320
Posts573,852
Members14,691
| |
Most Online32,084 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,036 Likes: 244
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,036 Likes: 244 |
I would say correct. Same as in my 1907 Lang. I have never had any issue with my Lang single trigger. Works flawlessly
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122 |
I would say correct. Same as in my 1907 Lang. I have never had any issue with my Lang single trigger. Works flawlessly Thanks so muchI Great to hear about your Lang. I read that they were another consistent customer for the Baker trigger. In my digging around, I found that adding a single trigger to these guns could ad 15% - 20% to the price, so they seldom went on lower end guns.
The NRA has proven itself unreliable and corrupt. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,228 Likes: 35
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,228 Likes: 35 |
I saw this thread and shared it with Steve Dalzell. He really likes the gun and asked me to share his thoughts:
"What a very nice gun! By a very good, if little known maker, too. "I've done a little research and come up with the following, which you might like to add to the discussion. "Date: From Ford's records, which do exist despite the confident claim in the tread that they do not! 1908 "Proof marks: Date to post 1904 with a re-proof after 1954 and before 1989 "Trigger: Baker patent 19,430 of 1901. This is a selective single trigger, though I'm not surprised that everyone has missed that as the selection is done by pushing the trigger forward. It reverts to right/left firing after a left/right sequence so you have to select left/right every time you want to use it. It seems quite a few of the best Birmingham makers used this pattern. I have a picture of a similar quality Charles Boswell so fitted. "You're welcome!"
Learn something every day....
fiery, dependable, occasionally transcendent
|
|
2 members like this:
Geoff Roznak, SKB |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122 |
I saw this thread and shared it with Steve Dalzell. He really likes the gun and asked me to share his thoughts:
"What a very nice gun! By a very good, if little known maker, too. "I've done a little research and come up with the following, which you might like to add to the discussion. "Date: From Ford's records, which do exist despite the confident claim in the tread that they do not! 1908 "Proof marks: Date to post 1904 with a re-proof after 1954 and before 1989 "Trigger: Baker patent 19,430 of 1901. This is a selective single trigger, though I'm not surprised that everyone has missed that as the selection is done by pushing the trigger forward. It reverts to right/left firing after a left/right sequence so you have to select left/right every time you want to use it. It seems quite a few of the best Birmingham makers used this pattern. I have a picture of a similar quality Charles Boswell so fitted. "You're welcome!"
Learn something every day.... Of course, I set down my laptop and went down to check this immediately. Mr. Dalzell is correct - it is indeed a selective single trigger, and works exactly as he describes. There's a slight reluctance for the 2nd barrel to fire with snap caps when the trigger is pushed forward - I'll have to look into that. Is there a way for me to thank Mr. Dalzell directly?
The NRA has proven itself unreliable and corrupt. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122 |
"Proof marks: Date to post 1904 with a re-proof after 1954 and before 1989 I meant to reply to this as well: There is a London reproof mark from 1989 at the left rear of the left barrel - it's hard to see in the photo above as it was obscured by grease.
The NRA has proven itself unreliable and corrupt. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122 |
The NRA has proven itself unreliable and corrupt. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,228 Likes: 35
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,228 Likes: 35 |
fiery, dependable, occasionally transcendent
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122 |
The NRA has proven itself unreliable and corrupt. Period.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,036 Likes: 244
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,036 Likes: 244 |
Gun Spa? That's a first for me. Very nice gun. Your friend's spa did a wonderful job.
Mike Proctor
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 953 Likes: 122 |
Gun Spa? That's a first for me. I was looking for something to call it other than "over at Bill's house." Very nice gun. Your friend's spa did a wonderful job. He does very nice work, and it's all donated for any guns that will be used for RGS.
The NRA has proven itself unreliable and corrupt. Period.
|
|
|
|
|